anybody try
to enable/integrate the webkit developer console in surf? I like these in other
browsers for the DOM inspection and resource tracking.
kind regards,
cryptix
You also might want to check gottox contribution to the wiki.
http://surf.suckless.org/files/autologin
basically it show how to use surfs cookiejar with external scripts. you most
likly need to adept it to ur site though..
kind regards,
cryptix
>
patch?)
I'd really dislike scrolling. Maybe I'm prejudiced because of bad configuration
but I always got pissed of when I scrolled inside an active
less/vim/mutt/whatever session. What your terminal program than displays is
rubbish.
I don't get it.. I never thought it's a nice feature..
Scrolling should be handled by the individual program IMHO.
cryptix
Is a scrollback buffer really that usefull? I always get lost in them...
Personally I'm much more comfortable with the history of my shell and less,
grep or all kinds of other programs for long output.
But I'd love to hear how you guys feel about this.
kind regards,
cryptix
en’ defined but not used
Looks like you forgot to take one out again. ;)
Kind regards,
cryptix
On 02.09.2010, at 12:05, Stefan Mark wrote:
> Some Programs relay on it.
Sounds more like some programs make poor design choices depending on it.
Imho colors and boldness should only be used to emphasize parts of the gui.
Fixing up workarounds in one program to have better output from another...
ke q (or fid in surf.sh) isn't handled anyway but trying
to remove the second argument I get 'error: 'q' undeclared here".
What is its purpose? How should one do this properly?
Thanks,
cryptix
Hi,
libwebkit-1.1.15.3-1 breaks surf (and i heard uzbl, too).
try to get 1.1.15.2-1, which might be in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/ if you
haven't cleaned after the update or just installed.
no problem,
C.
On 31.10.2009, at 19:03, Lorenzo Bolla wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried to compile the latest
Hey there,
On 23.09.2009, at 15:44, Nils wrote:
Thanks cryptix. As you can tell I'm not very experienced with C and
this
little patch was more of a hack anyway. :)
you’re welcome, I don’t consider me to be very experienced either. :)
Due to the removal of the prefix = g_strdup_print
.
searchengines.patch
Description: Binary data
On 23.09.2009, at 14:05, cryptix wrote:
Hey Nils,
like the patch, the unfree()ed prefixes were bugging me, though.
Updated it a bit, hope you agree.
Kind regards,
cryptix
Hey Nils,
like the patch, the unfree()ed prefixes were bugging me, though.
Updated it a bit, hope you agree.
Kind regards,
cryptix
searchengines.patch
Description: Binary data
11 matches
Mail list logo
