are.
Have you already tried to use the current master with default settings?
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
workings of networking
devices instead of spamming this list with the same stuff over and over again.
As someone prior to me said, you act like you're on reddit.
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
tend
which handles the I/O for you. lchat[0] might be interesting for you.
I'm sure you already know that, but I want to be certain.
[0] https://tools.suckless.org/lchat
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
Hi Laslo,
On Wed Feb 8, 2023 at 5:48 PM CET, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 10:17:47 +
> "Tom Schwindl" wrote:
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> > I've recently (well, a few days/weeks ago) read quite a few
> > discussions on a wide variety of mailing l
file states
something like "(c) 2010-2015".
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
nt to access it from
> a shell script.
>
> I am open to modifying the dwm source code if necessary.
>
> Regards,
> Farzat
selmon isn't a command. It's a variable in the source code located at
dwm.c:269 (upstream). You could write a function like the following to dump
dated
patch to match this behaviour. Let me know if that's what you meant.
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c
index 253aba7b6f7d..c5dd6db5c84c 100644
--- a/dwm.c
+++ b/dwm.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static void seturgent(Client *c, int urg);
static void showhide(Cli
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
95 | return __builtin___strncpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len,
> | ^~
>96 | __glibc_objsize (__dest));
>
> This was enough to stop me updating from 6.3.
>
The last time I could find a modified strncpy in the logs in one of those
places is somewhere around 2009. This isn't something introduced lately and
should also occur when building older versions of dwm.
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
; for the 1st tab, and this isn't a problem if in the previous command I do
> "dvtm_status" instead of "dvtm".. A bit puzzled. While at it - does anyone
Setting "BAR_AUTOHIDE" in your `config.h' to "false" should do the trick.
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 05:26:52PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 12:23:01PM +0000, Tom Schwindl wrote:
> > ranlib(1) is, in fact, legacy. It was used to create symbol tables for
> > archives
> > before ar(1) wa
files...
which not only makes the creation of static libraries more portable,
but also simpler.
[1]
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2008edition/utilities/ar.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/binutils/ranlib.html
--
Best Regards,
Tom Schwindl
12 matches
Mail list logo
