Re: [dev] Is there rss/atom feed for entire http://hg.suckless.org/ ?

2010-01-27 Thread Ray Kohler
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Armando Di Cianno wrote: > I follow 5 or so projects on suckless, and like to package up specific > revisions via Gentoo portage; so I wait for updates with bated breath > and all that. > > Simply, is there a single rss/atom feed for the entire collection? > It's

Re: [dev] simple portscanner

2010-01-02 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, anonymous wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote: >> licenses are stupid >> > > I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain? > Will adding of "/* Public Domain */" into every source file be enough? Some parts of the world

Re: [dev] [stali] corrupted pack

2009-12-03 Thread Ray Kohler
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Julien Steinhauser wrote: > Hello, > > Here is the output from fetching stali : > > x...@eol:~/stali$ git clone git://stali.yokuts.org/ > Initialized empty Git repository in /home/x/stali/stali.yokuts.org/.git/ > remote: Counting objects: 52224, done. > remote: Com

[dev] [dwm] new release soon?

2009-09-19 Thread Ray Kohler
Anselm, do you plan on tagging dwm 5.7 soon? It seems to me that there's been enough bugs fixed and sufficiently many third-party patches that don't apply cleanly any more that it would make sense. (Or are you planning on finishing the Xinerama rework first?)

Re: [dev] [surf] patches: configurable file locations, bookmark writer, history writer

2009-09-11 Thread Ray Kohler
2009/9/9 Mikael Schönenberg : > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 15:31, Ray Kohler wrote: >> The difficulty with using xprop to read and write surf's URL is that >> even though I have the XID when the session starts, there's a risk >> that it changes. Links may open themsel

[dev] [surf] 0.1 dist tarball broken

2009-09-11 Thread Ray Kohler
The surf 0.1 tarball doesn't build. (I'm packing it for Arch AUR.) There are two problems: the tarball doesn't contain config.def.h ; and even if it did, there is an extra variable "background" in it that's not used, and kills the build because of -Werror. I'll work around these in my PKGBUILD, but

Re: [dev] [surf] patches: configurable file locations, bookmark writer, history writer

2009-09-09 Thread Ray Kohler
is functionality - just the best ways I could think of so far. I've regenerated these patches after the last round of changes. # HG changeset patch # User Ray Kohler # Date 1252501698 14400 # Node ID c63f78bf2dbba972846d04bc6298e9dc05c51943 # Parent 991d3036e5e2d98f6f47fae443335ee3cb2d03bf

[dev] [surf] patches: configurable file locations, bookmark writer, history writer

2009-09-08 Thread Ray Kohler
g the files, so race conditions exist. I figured I'd wait to see how this was solved for the new cookie handling rather than doing my own thing. # HG changeset patch # User Ray Kohler # Date 1252462667 14400 # Node ID 9819d5a95fb7baf1cc063b0815fc0163efd550c

Re: [dev] Talk about sane web browsers

2009-09-06 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Uriel wrote: > You can't have a "sane web browser"[1] with an insane rendering > engine. All you are doing otherwise is giving a turd another coat of > paint. > > At the moment my only hope for a minimally sane web rendering engine > is http://www.netsurf-browser.org

Re: [dev] Re: [surf] cookie race condition for multiple instances?

2009-09-05 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Enno Boland (Gottox) wrote: >> Hey! >> >> I hope I get some free time tomorrow to get cookies working more properly. >> >>> FWIW, in uzbl we use an external script to take care of cookie storage and >>> retriev

[dev] Re: [surf] cookie race condition for multiple instances?

2009-09-03 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Ray Kohler wrote: > I'm curious as to whether a race condition is created for access to > the soup cookie jar file when multiple instances of surf are running. > libsoup's docs don't mention any safety mechanisms for this object, so &g

Re: [dev] DWM 5.6.1 and pertag patch

2009-08-31 Thread Ray Kohler
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Bartosz Nitkiewicz wrote: > Hello everyone. > I have problem with pertag patch on DWM 5.6.1. I try to patch source but with > no result. Patch was found on ML (attached). I also attached dwm.c.rej file. > Could somebody help me to solve this problem becouse patch

[dev] [surf] cookie race condition for multiple instances?

2009-08-30 Thread Ray Kohler
I'm curious as to whether a race condition is created for access to the soup cookie jar file when multiple instances of surf are running. libsoup's docs don't mention any safety mechanisms for this object, so I'm expecting trouble is possible. Does anyone actually know for sure?

Re: [dev] dwm is awesome!

2009-08-27 Thread Ray Kohler
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Anders Andersson wrote: > Heh, I just started using dwm myself, and I love it! I wanted to try a > tiling window manager, and did some basic research and dwm seemed to > suit me best. I wish I did this switch years ago. I might want to try > wmii too, mainly because

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-23 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/8/22 Ray Kohler : >> I'm rather curious on where st will go, and what kinds of things other >> terminals do that it will or won't do. > > Well my plan is to achieve *good* xterm compliance and 256 color

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-23 Thread Ray Kohler
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:31 AM, James PIC wrote: > On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Ray Kohler wrote: >> - Will it implement enough of xterm's capabilities that I could lie >> about $TERM and expect it to mostly work? I log into many remote >> machines of various OS t

[dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-08-22 Thread Ray Kohler
I'm rather curious on where st will go, and what kinds of things other terminals do that it will or won't do. In particular: - Is a scrollback buffer objectionable in principle, such that we should expect to "just use GNU screen"? - Will it implement enough of xterm's capabilities that I could lie