>Can you point me to the specific part in the specification which would
>indicate this is a bug vs
>the standard?
The relevant material is on page 49 of the standard. You may find the standard
here:
https://www.itu.int/rec/dologin_pub.asp?lang=e&id=T-REC-T.416-199303-I!!PDF-E&type=items
``A pa
I'm curious about the state of my patches. I've not seen them added to
the current version of st.
Am I simply being impatient or is there something wrong with them?
Also, my last questions don't seem to have been responded to. Are there
any thoughts on them now?
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:31:39 +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma
wrote:
> I'm curious, is there a specific program you use where this bug is noticable?
I noticed this bug present in every terminal emulator I've tested; I've
been writing a terminal abstraction library, as the language I'm using
lacks a good
Follows is the proper form of the st patch submitted earlier,
st-fix_8613_colors-0.8.1.diff:
diff -up st-0.8.1/st.c st-0.8.1-changed/st.c
--- st-0.8.1/st.c Tue Mar 20 15:29:59 2018
+++ st-0.8.1-changed/st.c Wed Jul 25 13:55:16 2018
@@ -1157,7 +1157,7 @@ csiparse(void)
7;ll still release these six changed lines to the public
domain, for simplicity:
diff -c /home/programmer/st-0.8.1/st.c\~ /home/programmer/st-0.8.1/st.c
*** /home/programmer/st-0.8.1/st.c~ Tue Mar 20 15:29:59 2018
--- /home/programmer/st-0.8.1/st.c Fri Jul 13 19:32:43 2018
***
***
The relevant material is on page 49 of the standard.
The first of the two issues is the least concerning:
``A parameter substring for values 38 or 48 may be divided by one or
more separators (03/10) into parameter elements''...
Due to the ``may'', it seems fair to interpret this as allowing eith
I was not aware of this. I have pushed my changes to the wiki. Thank
you for telling me about this.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 09:45:31 +0200 Programmer Nerd
> wrote:
>> I noticed that b
I noticed that barM.c obtained from here
dwm.suckless.org/dwmstatus/barM.c was using fixed buffers without
concern for the length of said buffer creating the possibility of a
buffer overflow.
I have also declared global variables and functions static because
there is only one file. This may lead t
I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas
have caugth my attention.
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:41:12PM +0100, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 02:46 PM, Peter John Hartman wrote:
> > I agree
As you said, it is the first hit and it points to suckless.org
i could not care less about what an article on wikipedia says about
dwm, if a potential user reads the article, as long as the reference link
points to suckless.org its cool with me.
"...and nothing of value was lost"
On Wed, Feb 24,
10 matches
Mail list logo
