On 06/17/2011 10:37 AM, markus schnalke wrote:
> For the same reason we want Unix's manifold toolchain and for the same
> reason we want several programming languages: Because ``One fits all''
> is an illusion.
Then try to figure out some basic tools that you can glue together to
form a fully fun
On 06/07/2011 07:09 PM, pancake wrote:
> Its anti natural.
It's not.
Because I asked myself which is the best working environment regarding
ones eyes some time ago, I looked around for some scientific research on
the topic of black-background vs white background.
There's not that much research t
> Wait in fact I don't know what that means.
In fact, the word I wanted to use was 'preferences'.
;)
Or this person just has some simple privileges that are not met by dwm
or any other window manager he knows of.
Kurt you should sometimes just simply shut the fuck up and go out and
get some life instead of pissing around and being unfriendly despite
naiveness of the question asked.
...
On 0
On 05/12/2011 03:51 PM, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> I still have to find any sane mathematical notation for parallelism in
> programming languages though...
Of course CSP goes in this direction, but as soon as your language is
not based on CSP in any way, you yet again have to document describi
> I am
> saying if your code needs UML documentation to be understood, then it
> is not suckless.
I fully agree.
> Also, I tend to dislike auto-generated documentation because the
> valuable part is very small and hidden among loads of crap.
That depends on the tool you (have to) use. As an ex
On 05/10/2011 04:57 PM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
> Good code is supposed to be readable, and should need no
> UML diagram (and probably very few comments).
Though you're right that it should not _need_ a UML diagram, having one
isn't that bad either. This is especially true when you're not
On 05/11/2011 07:02 AM, CHABOT Simon wrote:
> I have already used it to draw graph, but never I never though to try it for
> UML. I take a look !
In case you add documentation with doxygen to some projects, you can use
it to produce UML diagrams of your classes. Doxygen itself uses dot...
So usi
On 09/10/2010 07:46 PM, v4hn wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:19:38PM +0300, Nikhilesh S wrote:
>> I haven't really understood the problems with C++ that the people here
>> that have problems with C++ have[...]
>
> Felix von Leitner gave a pretty good presentation in 2007 on such problems :)
>
I guess you should make your configuration changes to config.h instead
of config.def.h. the latter one is there to have some 'reference
configuration' if you have f***ed up your config.h.
regards
On 03/08/2010 01:05 AM, anonymous wrote:
> Erlang is not good to write a port scanner.
Do you have any sane justification for this remarque?
On 03/03/2010 06:28 PM, Anders Andersson wrote:
> What would be the benefits of porting dwm to a new language? From my
> point of view, dwm is already functional and mature, porting it over
> to Go doesn't sound very constructive.
And porting it is a real pain, at the moment. For example, you don'
On 03/03/2010 02:46 PM, Peter John Hartman wrote:
> I agree about the issue trackers + the mail integration. A small
> suggestion: none of the issue/bug tracking systems do collaboration very
> well either. What I mean by "collaboration" is the capacity to pass a
> single document back and forth
On 02/05/2010 03:47 PM, Alexander Surma wrote:
>> I'm forced to use jmeter for the next two weeks at work. It's a swing
>> app. Swing and dwm don't seem to wrk at all.
> Doesn't the good ol' ``export AWT_TOOKIT=MToolkit'' work for ya?
> If not, define "not working".
>
> Surma
>
>
In most swin
On 02/01/2010 10:25 PM, Uriel wrote:
> If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your
> fucking window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
This is not the first time that you confuse cause and result. Additionally, you
seem to not have a fucking clue about peop
On 02/01/2010 12:02 PM, Uriel wrote:
> People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
> pick bearable colors should not pick colors (just ask for advice from
> an artists as Rob did for acme and rio).
Desktop Look&Feel Communism up ahead.
Yours is the most retarded and human
Oh and what he might mean with outline moving: just drawing the outline of a
window that is to be moved, looking as if you only move around its border to
the window's future position and not actually moving the window until you have
decided where to place it.
On 02/01/2010 08:05 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> What do you exactly mean?
I guess he means that when dragging windows in float mode, some applications
behave like f***. For example, start a ddd session over ssh and move the window
around when the debugger is running. Though I'm using xmonad, the b
On 01/03/2010 01:11 AM, hiro wrote:
> Often it's better to listen to your intuition and ignore German laws.
> Especially if you are no lawyer and just read about so-called laws on
> Wikipedia.
most stupid idea ever. if you're in the software industry and wish to make your
source public you should
Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 04:01:43PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
xmessage can read from pipes?
make xmessage read from stdin with the "-file -" option, e.g.
echo "mmh" | xmessage -file -
regards,
Nicolai
20 matches
Mail list logo
