On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Can you not get an exemption from your employer so you can freely contribute
> to this project under your own name?
It's possible, but does require more review. Given the trivial nature
of my patch, and the fact that Quentin already pr
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
> Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't take.
> We prefer to deny these patches in favor of staying away from possible
> risks of this nature, so please either commit th
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Evan Gates wrote:
> In most cases authors of small patches are not added to the LICENSE of
> suckless projects.
> -emg
Understandable, given the number of contributors of 3-line changes.
I've confirmed the corporate requirement for such a copyright line,
however.
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Matthew Wesley wrote:
>>
>> Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
>> requirements.
>> ---
>> LICENSE | 1 +
>> st.c| 6 +++---
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 dele
The font size is actually a double and can have non-integer values when
fonts are specified in point size instead of pixel size. Update zoom
functions to preserve the fractional component in a float. Some small
precision is lost, but the zoom reset function gets very close to the
original size and