> On 16. Jun 2020, at 22:30, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
>
>> On 16. Jun 2020, at 20:53, Mattias Andrée wrote:
>>
>> I'm assuming temp.value i an `int`, as %d is used. The problem was
>> probably that `1E6` is actually a `double` rather than an `int`,
>
> On 16. Jun 2020, at 20:53, Mattias Andrée wrote:
>
> I'm assuming temp.value i an `int`, as %d is used. The problem was
> probably that `1E6` is actually a `double` rather than an `int`,
> as the whole expression is promoted to `double`, because `bprintf` is
> (I assume) variadic, and the com
> On 11 Aug 2016, at 16:56, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> You are using Apple Mail.
I know. Not sure why this is relevant to this thread.
[I also use mutt, mailx, surf, monit, sct, sxiv, dwm, amethyst,
vim, sometimes firefox, and a very long list of other small
pieces and a few
> On 11 Aug 2016, at 16:17, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:17:30 +0200 Paul Menzel wrote:
>> Dear suckless folks,
>>
>>
>> st 0.6 was released in June 2015, that means over a year ago.
>>
>> Since then, there were another 76 commits included into the master b
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:32:18PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> Qentin Rameau wrote:
> > > > > 'sent empty' with empty being a 0-length file will produce a
> > > > > memory access error.
> >
> > I think I was able to fix that, please try the recent patch I posted on
> > hackers@.
Yes, the last ch
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:47:39PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
> > Have you compiled sent with address sanitizer as suggested in the link, or
> > enabled the malloc.conf J option on OpenBSD, as mentioned above?
>
> Heyho Joerg,
>
> sorry, I miss
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:53:16AM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
> > Here comes another one...
> >
> > As mentioned in this thread:
> > http://marc.info/?t=14477246942&r=1&w=2 in this mail:
> > http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=1
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:27:53PM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:06:26PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> >
> > there are bug reports and there are "bug reports".
>
> Here comes another one...
Since these bugs are rather serious, it woul
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:06:26PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
>
> there are bug reports and there are "bug reports".
Here comes another one...
As mentioned in this thread:
http://marc.info/?t=14477246942&r=1&w=2 in this mail:
http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=144774881126397&w=2
'sent emp
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:18:01PM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 01:46 PM, Jack L. Frost wrote:
> > As a packager, I'd very much appreciate tagging once in a while so that
> > we have
> > static targets for patching and packaging.
>
> I don't know git well, just the basics, b
t hard, it's just wrong.
No matter if this is wrong or not, with most distributions packages and
versions are there and will not go away soon.
Regards,
Joerg
> On June 1, 2015 5:07:15 PM CEST, Joerg Jung wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >you are both wrong.
> >
> >On Mon,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:14:17PM +0200, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> From the average suckless user's view, knowing what source is compiled
> and what config included is always wanted and preferred over other
> people's bu
Hi,
you are both wrong.
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 04:39:39PM +0200, 7heo wrote:
> My point exactly. Plus, it does not even solve an actual problem.
It does, it makes life for downstream package maintainers (like me)
easier, as no cherry-picking of patches or own releases are required.
> On June
> Am 01.06.2015 um 11:16 schrieb Dmitrij D. Czarkoff :
>
> There have been more then 2 years since 0.6 surf release (2013-02-10).
> Maybe it is time for 0.7?
Yes, please.
Tagging a new release would help downstream
package maintainers.
Thanks,
Regards,
Joerg
> Am 24.11.2014 um 09:44 schrieb Anthony J. Bentley :
>
> "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff" writes:
>> I believe it is not actively developed for several years, and it seems
>> to have lost its momentum.
>
> It's certainly not active, but neither is it completely dead. Actually,
> they just branched a new
Am 21.02.2014 um 08:41 schrieb koneu :
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 20 February 2014 18:27, koneu wrote:
>>> Nick wrote:
Yes, but the web-viewer could suck less, internally. GTK & glib
being rather obvious examples. With that in mind I thought I'd take
another look at webkitnix t
> Am 28.12.2013 um 00:54 schrieb Markus Teich :
>
> I would like to hide the mouse cursor when typing. What is your approach?
On OpenBSD I use the package for xbanish:
https://github.com/jcs/xbanish
Regards,
Joerg
Am 20.12.2013 um 16:22 schrieb Anthony J. Bentley :
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>> There is also the question of finding a new C99 optimizing
>> compiler written properly in C of course.
>>
>> tinycc is interesting. It would require just a few basic
>> optimizatio
Am 06.08.2013 um 10:51 schrieb Chris Down :
> On 2013-08-06 10:31, Joerg Jung wrote:
>> In you patch "not valid" means "contains no dot", this makes it impossible
>> to search for something with a dot, e.g.: e.g. :)
>> Maybe look for a (starting) space in
Am 31.07.2013 um 10:40 schrieb Ari Malinen :
> https://github.com/defer-/my-projects/blob/master/surf-0.6-searchengine.diff
>
> I wrote patch which adds search engine integration. If you dont
> provide any arguments surf loads homepage. If you provide url which is
> not valid then surf passes it
Am 23.07.2013 um 15:50 schrieb Robert Schneider :
>> In dontkillme(), wouldn't it be desirable to close the file descriptor?
>
> Shit, good catch. [1_dontkillme_v2.patch]
> --
> ziggomatic
> <1_dontkillme_v2.patch>
I think this unportable and totally linux specific,
h
Am 11.06.2013 um 18:26 schrieb Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
>>> Also Christop/__20h__ is working on some mail client that sounded quite nice
>>> and interesting from the description, but afaik it is not yet available(?).
>>
>> I've heard Christoph mention this, but never seen a description
Am 20.04.2013 um 15:32 schrieb Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> I am glad to announce the 0.4.1 release of st.
Thanks.
> Main release reason:
> * st now compiles on OpenBSD again
This affected others using BSDmake as well.
>* This error has there been for a longer time. Learn to speak
Am 19.04.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:11:22 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley"
> wrote:
>> That's because the st makefiles use $(shell ...) which is a GNUism.
>
> I’ve applied your patch. Thanks.
Good. Would you mind rolling a new release, so that
24 matches
Mail list logo
