.com/index.php/Change-Windows-Xp-Shell_t20367.html
>
> Have fun. -POLM
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Benjamin Conner
> wrote:
> > what I mean is use wmii instead of whatever xp uses by default (the
> > proprietary (sp) one).
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at
what I mean is use wmii instead of whatever xp uses by default (the
proprietary (sp) one).
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Benjamin Conner
> wrote:
> > but like, how about being able to replace the default windows xp window
but like, how about being able to replace the default windows xp window
manager with ii? that wold be amazing!
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Jacob Todd [2009-05-30 20:24]:
> > Port it to windows.
>
> Or run it in cygwin.
> They even have precompiled packages.
>
>
I think it has gotten better. I have only been using it since yesterday but
it seems great. I like webkit. I know you can use gecko but I like webkit
better.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> I used to use kazehakase regularly, because they kept promising gtk+
> webcore
hmmm. It works for me.
I like it now (.5.4) It's working with everything. I love those UI levels
too. I keep it on medium mostly.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 11:19 AM, pancake wrote:
> Benjamin Conner wrote:
>
>> Anyone tried this lightweight browser? Idk if it's the lgith
Anyone tried this lightweight browser? Idk if it's the lgithest around but
it's certainly faster than FF and I like it alot. I compiled it with webkit
and it seems to work for everything I use. I just kinda want to see what
everyone thinks of it. http://kazekahase.sf.jp
I use gmail though. I'll just make another account.
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Uriel wrote:
> Most email filtering tools (eg., procmail) allow to trivially match
> strings in the body of an email rather than in the subject. (I'm
> amazed that I need to point this out).
>
> uriel
>
> On Mo
opic" or whatever, and have the dwm lists for dwm stuff.
> Why
> > >> is there a problem with that?
> > >
> > > I completely agree. Mixing the two lists has definitely flared some
> > > tempers and I would definitely be open to the idea of splitting them
&g
gt; >> list was mainly the "dwv" list but why not change that? Have this list
> for
> >> kindof "off topic" or whatever, and have the dwm lists for dwm stuff.
> Why
> >> is there a problem with that?
> >
> > I completely agree. Mixing
> > > dwm. Correct me if I am wrong. As much as I am thrilled to read
> > > about what is the best way to describe shortcut in wmii manual, I
> > > should not be forced to read that except if I choose to do so. Same
> > > as would make no sense to mix dwm and gnom
ess the delete button.
>
> uriel
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Benjamin Conner
> wrote:
> >> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
> >
> > That's a great idea!
> >
> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin
>
> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
That's a great idea!
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, pmarin wrote:
> Why not to maintain dwm list and redirect its content to dev list?
>
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Benjamin Conner
> w
I'd like to know this too. I would only like dwm ones like the lists used
to be.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Dusan wrote:
> Is there a way to get only dwm related emails? Since lists are merged I
> get bunch of wmii related ones and frankly I don't need them at all.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
it looks cool. I will maybe test it out when I get home.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Has anyone tried out uzbl (http://uzbl.org)? Seems interesting, it would
> be nice to replace firefox with this. I plan on installing it on my
> gentoo system later today.
>
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
