Re: [dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-07 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2015-09-07 14:54 +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I assumed you'd use a signal, but I'm just wondering about your stop > script, can you share it? Currently my scripts are a mess and perhaps I should use some more standard solutions but here it goes: https://github.com/ypsu/desktop-configuration/

Re: [dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-07 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2015-09-07 13:12 +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > How do you reflect the running init process that it should re-exec > itself from your stop script? You mean how do I notify init? Well, I send it a signal. It should be quite simple to do this in sinit without a new signal: just get it reexec itse

[dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-06 Thread Balazs Kezes
Hey! Although I don't use sinit directly but I do use a very similar minimalistic init program in which I've managed to track down a problem. It seems sinit is also suffering from the same problem as I've seen no workarounds in it for this. Usually of one the last steps in shutdown/reboot phase i

Re: [dev] Why do you use tmux/screen?

2014-07-01 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-07-01 13:00 +0100, Raphaƫl Proust wrote: > At some point, I use to run a vim inside a tmux inside a window. It > turned out to be super annoying because all the shortcuts to move the > windows, splits, and views ended up being very similar and got mixed > up from time to time. Yup, that's

Re: [dev] suckless distro

2014-06-24 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-06-24 12:39 +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > The most suckless aspect of Arch is nearly undisposable systemd, I > believe. Assuming you've meant "suckful". :) Excuse my ignorance but can you elaborate on the "undisposability" of systemd? I'm running Arch on two machines (armv6 and x86_

Re: [dev] [st] mouse up scrolling not working in vim through tmux in st

2014-06-01 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-06-01 15:58 +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > Sidenote: while looking at tmux under st I experienced a lot of > > other rendering problems. I suspect this is because st's VT100 > > emulation is a bit weak. In case this is something the suckless > > community would like to fix, I recommend

Re: [dev] [st] mouse up scrolling not working in vim through tmux in st

2014-05-31 Thread Balazs Kezes
/putty-X/commit/bbced [2] http://sourceforge.net/p/tmux/tickets/128/ [3] http://invisible-island.net/vttest/vttest.html -- Balazs >From 2cdd8ae4d5a76bdf735dec7f86bbfb41f3cd753d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Balazs Kezes Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 22:24:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Don't report rel

Re: [dev] [st] [patch] misplaced parenthesis in LEN macro

2014-04-20 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-04-20 14:43 +0200, FRIGN wrote: > However, I don't see any error in the way it was done before noname > suggested changing it. It's a common practice in C macros to enclose each argument instance with parentheses to avoid most pitfalls. This particular case will most probably be fine witho

Re: [dev] [st] Understading st behaviour

2014-04-16 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-04-16 05:19 -0300, Amadeus Folego wrote: > I am using tmux just for the scrollback and paste capabilities There's a patch for scrollback for st at [1]. Maybe you can try that as well as alternative. [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/wmii/q1KNvhpiheI -- Balazs

Re: [dev] [st] Understading st behaviour

2014-04-15 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2014-04-15 18:44 +0200, Markus Wichmann wrote: > st reacted to the DELETE_WINDOW message by killing the shell with > SIGHUP. Now, your shell may ignore SIGHUP, since it is waiting for > mutt to finish. Or it may die. If it died and sent mutt the SIGHUP, > too, that would be great, however, some