On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 04:24:53AM -0700, Aaron Burrow wrote:
> > This ii behavior is surprising.
> >
> > user$ ruby -e "puts 'A'*512+'B'*20" > server/channel/in
> >
> &g
This ii behavior is surprising.
user$ ruby -e "puts 'A'*512+'B'*20" > server/channel/in
user$ tail -f server/channel/out
1533032971 -!- nick(~nick@1.2.3.4) has joined #channel
1533033745
AAA
quark has a 1 byte NULL stack overflow triggered by an HTTP request for a
folder path not ending with '/' and having length PATH_MAX-1. Relevant
code from http.c:http_send_response()
if (S_ISDIR(st.st_mode)) {
/* add / to target if not present */
len = strlen(realtarget);
wizard book
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> >- K&R
>> >- The practice of programming
>> >- The dragon book
>> >- The standard C library. P.J. Plauger
>> >- Lions book
>> >- The desing of the unix operating system. J. Bach
>> >- The art of unix programming
>> >- Let
If we're going to fix a bunch of formatting problems we should make
sure the problem doesn't resurface. Put a commit hook on the git
server that either validates formatting or does auto-formatting.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 18:15:25 +0200, FRI
This patch makes it so that the syntax coloring updates when you give
a document a name for the first time.
editor.c | 19 +--
editor.h | 3 +++
vis.c| 6 ++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/editor.c b/editor.c
index 668062c..0e3e603 100644
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Dnia 23 maja 2014 23:18 Anders Andersson napisał(a):
>
>> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Nick wrote:
>> > The ISC license[0] is simpler still, and in much nicer English,
>> > which I like. But MIT/X is perfectly fine too for our purposes h
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:29 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
>> Yeah, write an awk version is a big challenge, and it is something that
>> for sure cannot be done without thinking a lot about it. It also has
>> the problem of adding a new
>> However, and that's where I see the big problem, this system doesn't
comply with the set of common POSIX-standards and thus would require
huge changes or even complete rewrites of basic software we use every
day.
What do you think of minix 3?
http://wiki.minix3.org/en/DevelopersGuide/PosixAndMi
