Re: [dev] Suckless CMatrix clone

2022-05-30 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Mon, 30 May 2022 07:33:24 -0400 LM wrote: Dear LM, > Thanks for the reviews. That's really helpful to know. As mentioned, > I haven't tried them myself. you're welcome! > That looks really useful. I noticed the break testing in libgrapheme. > Is it possible to use this as a replacement f

Re: [dev] Suckless CMatrix clone

2022-05-30 Thread LM
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 4:56 AM Laslo Hunhold wrote: > having dove deep into UTF-8 and Unicode, I can at least say that > libutf8proc has an unsafe UTF-8-decoder, as it doesn't catch overlong > encodings. There are also multiple other pitfalls. Thanks for the reviews. That's really helpful to kn

Re: [dev] Suckless CMatrix clone

2022-05-30 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Sun, 29 May 2022 13:48:49 -0400 LM wrote: Dear LM, > I like that point. Not a fan of glib and I try to avoid software > that uses it. > > Don't know how good they are, but I've run across several lighter > utf-8 C libraries: > https://github.com/cls/libutf > https://github.com/JuliaStrings/