Re: [dev] sshd?

2021-07-06 Thread 201009-suckless
Looking at https://github.com/mkj/dropbear -- it seems like every sshd just grows to include things like X11/port forwarding Would rather have a small sshd with docs that say run netcat if you want port-forwarding.

Re: [dev] sshd?

2021-07-06 Thread Jeremy
On 07/07/21 08:55AM, Patrick wrote: > What's a good minimal sshd? > > Or should we just run stunnel + telnetd? Thank you for bringing this up - I've been thinking about this a lot lately. It seems silly to run interactive terminal applications remotely, as, the remote machine: - won't ha

[dev] sshd?

2021-07-06 Thread Patrick
Hi all, What's a good minimal sshd? Or should we just run stunnel + telnetd? Patrick

Re: [dev] Enhanced arg.h from quark

2021-07-06 Thread Nikita Zlobin
In Tue, 6 Jul 2021 09:44:05 +0200 Laslo Hunhold wrote: > On Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:08:04 + > Sebastian LaVine wrote: > > Dear Sebastian, > > > Might I recommend using https://0x0.st or > > https://ix.io for pastebins. You can read and > > write to them using curl, or still use the browser > >

Re: [dev] Better naming for arg.h API

2021-07-06 Thread Nikita Zlobin
In Mon, 5 Jul 2021 13:36:50 +0200 Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > It is based on: > https://9fans.github.io/plan9port/man/man3/arg.html > > argc (count) and argv (array of strings) are the program argument > names. > Yup, and in this context - following name looks strange: > The function macro ARGC r

Re: [dev] Enhanced arg.h from quark

2021-07-06 Thread Laslo Hunhold
On Tue, 06 Jul 2021 00:08:04 + Sebastian LaVine wrote: Dear Sebastian, > Might I recommend using https://0x0.st or > https://ix.io for pastebins. You can read and > write to them using curl, or still use the browser > but without the extra fat and JS of pastebin.com. I'd recommend just atta