On 21/06/20 08:25, opal hart wrote:
> Suckless software isn't a void separate from the rest of the world,
Suckless software is following a specific set of principles, and the software
that sucks is not following those principles. The two are separate.
> and
> the "suckless philosophy" is constant
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:25:23PM +, opal hart wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2021 15:10:02 +0200
> Страхиња Радић wrote:
>
> > Speaking as (thus far) just a user of suckless programs and someone who
> > supports
> > suckless philosophy, it comes down to: why should this protocol be
> > supported
On Thu, 20 May 2021 13:04:08 -0400
"Greg Reagle" wrote:
> I have used dvtm in the past but gave up because of crashes that were
> unpredictable. I know C and I have recently learned a bit more about
> gdb and core dumps and debugging
Enable coredumps (`ulimit -c unlimited` works for the current
On Sat, 22 May 2021 15:10:02 +0200
Страхиња Радић wrote:
> Speaking as (thus far) just a user of suckless programs and someone who
> supports
> suckless philosophy, it comes down to: why should this protocol be supported?
> There isn't a significant number of existing suckless programs that need
