Hi Kajetan,
On 4 July 2017 at 14:23, Kajetan Jasztal wrote:
> What do you think can be the downsides of filesystem hierarchy of
> Gobo Linux[0]? STALI[1] was attempting to modify default hierarchy
> after all. I personaly think it's clear, evident (only problem I have
> is hiding symlinks in /) a
I use a modified version of the Gobo hierarchy (pretty much just
keeping programs in /Programs and symlinking them to root), and I
think it's a definite improvement on using a package manager or
installing to root. It's stupid simple to set up, the shell script I
use to symlinking everything is ~20
check tinycorelinux symlinks to squashfs mounts in
/tmp/tcloop/package/ hierarchy.
Kajetan Jasztal wrote:
> What do you think can be the downsides of filesystem hierarchy of
> Gobo Linux[0]? STALI[1] was attempting to modify default hierarchy
> after all. I personaly think it's clear, evident (only problem I have
> is hiding symlinks in /) and elegant. It's in a way compatible w
Hi Kamil,
On 4 July 2017 at 14:32, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> I've used my own for almost a decade: http://monitor.garbe.us/
>> It checkes the services every 20 minutes and sends me a mail if some
>> service goes offline.
>
> Care to share the code?
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:23:54PM +0200, Kajetan Jasztal wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> What do you think can be the downsides of filesystem hierarchy of
> Gobo Linux[0]? STALI[1] was attempting to modify default hierarchy
> after all. I personaly think it's clear, evident (only problem I have
> is hidin
without machine learning and genetic algorithms i fear i might get
woken up in the middle of the night.
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I've used my own for almost a decade: http://monitor.garbe.us/
> It checkes the services every 20 minutes and sends me a mail if some
> service goes offline.
Care to share the code?
Hi there,
What do you think can be the downsides of filesystem hierarchy of
Gobo Linux[0]? STALI[1] was attempting to modify default hierarchy
after all. I personaly think it's clear, evident (only problem I have
is hiding symlinks in /) and elegant. It's in a way compatible with
Unixes by symlink
Hi,
On 4 July 2017 at 11:31, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
with the git prot
Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_memory
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Techno Implant wrote:
>> Wrong: ...
>
> Sorry for posting again. Does that mean If I have single st window
> open it'll allocate 120MiB but won't actually use that?? And also
> other applications can't use that
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:23:58 +0200
"Ivan J." wrote:
Hey Ivan,
> How would anonymous pushing to the sites repository keep working?
you can push over git:// when push access is enabled. No need for a
ssh-login.
With best regards
Laslo Hunhold
--
Laslo Hunhold
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
>>> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
>>> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
>>>
>>> Just pointing that out
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:45 +0200
> Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> Hey Hiltjo,
>
> > Maybe we should only allow SSH for private repos and git:// for the
> > public ones (sites). This is also more efficient.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I assume you me
On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:12:45 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Hey Hiltjo,
> Maybe we should only allow SSH for private repos and git:// for the
> public ones (sites). This is also more efficient.
>
> What do you think?
I assume you mean that we only allow git:// for read-only cloning of
the repos a
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:46:58AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 July 2017 at 00:36, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > On 4 July 2017 at 00:06, Michael Forney wrote:
> >> I noticed that git.suckless.org is no longer accepting connections
> >> with the git protocol. HTTP still works though.
> >>
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo