Re: [dev] [ubase] pager

2017-02-03 Thread Mattias Andrée
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 20:42:06 +0100 Josuah Demangeon wrote: > I started such a tool recently. It is probably not > suckless, as it is already 1600 loc, but can properly > display a man page, colour escape codes and content from > UTF-8-test.txt and UTF8-demo.txt without ncurses. > > http://github

[dev] [st] Request for comments, cursor blink

2017-02-03 Thread Andy Valencia
I really liked the idea of st, but the alternate cursors don't work well without blinking--too hard to spot. Attached is my first attempt at adding code to a suckless project, comments welcome. Thanks, Andy Valenciadiff --git a/st.c b/st.c index fbcd9e0..4e7ab10 100644 --- a/st.c +++ b/st.c @@ -1

Re: [dev] structural regular expression support for vis

2017-02-03 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:00:37AM +, Raphaël Proust wrote: > On 2 February 2017 at 17:46, Marc André Tanner wrote: > >Sam supports a count specifier: s2/pattern/replacement/ only replaces > >the second occurrence of pattern. This is currently not supported but > >can be mimicked u

Re: [dev] [dmenu] problem with parameters

2017-02-03 Thread Ian Remmler
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:29:10PM +0100, Tobias Girstmair wrote: > I don't know what to say to you: No, it doesn't. > (I believe this to be a bug?) I believe you are conflating the behavior of dmenu and dmenu_run. dmenu returns "jj s" with success exit code, like the man page says it will. dmen

Re: [dev] [dmenu] problem with parameters

2017-02-03 Thread Tobias Girstmair
I don't know what to say to you: No, it doesn't. (I believe this to be a bug?) On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 03:35:36AM +0100, Quentin Rameau wrote: > > That's interesting. It doesn't do what you (and the man page; missed > > that, mea culpa) described > > Yes it does. >

Re: [dev] structural regular expression support for vis

2017-02-03 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 3 February 2017 at 10:00, Raphaël Proust wrote: > One thing that always bothers me with regexes is that the same syntax > (parens) is used for both overriding precedence (e.g., `(foo)*` to > specify that star operates on the sequence `foo`) and groups (to be > recalled with `\1`–`\9`). > > Anyo

Re: [dev] structural regular expression support for vis

2017-02-03 Thread Raphaël Proust
On 3 February 2017 at 10:00, Raphaël Proust wrote: > On 2 February 2017 at 17:46, Marc André Tanner wrote: >> […] >> * Multi file support is not really well supported: >> >> - The X and Y commands currently operate on windows, not files. >> Meaning that if a file is being displayed in

Re: [dev] [sbase] [tar] some errors

2017-02-03 Thread willy
Willy Gfn wrote: > Michael Forney wrote: > > On 12/24/16, Cág wrote: > > > Markus Wichmann wrote: > > > > > >> Well, that looks like it might be problematic, doesn't it? Especially > > >> when you find out, that the size of h->name there is 100 bytes. path > > >> contains, of course, the entire fi

Re: [dev] [sbase] [tar] some errors

2017-02-03 Thread willy
Michael Forney wrote: > On 12/24/16, Cág wrote: > > Markus Wichmann wrote: > > > >> Well, that looks like it might be problematic, doesn't it? Especially > >> when you find out, that the size of h->name there is 100 bytes. path > >> contains, of course, the entire file path relative to the startin

Re: [dev] [sbase] tar fails to extract bzip2

2017-02-03 Thread willy
Michael Forney wrote: > On 2/2/17, willy wrote: > > At this point, I'm not sure where to look at, or even if the bug > > really lies in tar and not in bzip2. > > I checked the size (both octal and converted) and the value is good. So > > I'm not sure why the headers are not well read. > > In the c

Re: [dev] Some core tools

2017-02-03 Thread Cág
Mattias Andrée wrote: > I'm not convinced mk(1) is less sucky > than POSIX make(1), but it may be less > sucky than many make(1) implementations. There is also bmake(1)[0], a port of NetBSD's make(1)[1]. OpenBSD has their own make(1)[2] as well. Cág [0]: http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.ht

Re: [dev] Some core tools

2017-02-03 Thread sylvain . bertrand
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 06:45:49PM +0100, Mattias Andrée wrote: > I'm work on implementing make(1) In theory, linux kbuild should be a good reference for the minimum set of makefile extensions to code. Well, in theory, the guys paid full-time at the linux fondation to work on kbuild, should have c

Re: [dev] structural regular expression support for vis

2017-02-03 Thread Raphaël Proust
On 2 February 2017 at 17:46, Marc André Tanner wrote: > […] > In the meantime lots of bugs have been fixed. I would like to encourage > all sam/acme users who are also somewhat familiar with vi(m) to try out > current master of vis and report back on their experience: > > https://github.com/mart