This is interesting. Thanks for sharing.
However, as welcome as alternatives to the current PKI system must be at
this point, replacing HTTPS and the rest of what we call "the web" with
nodejs, Qt, and JSON has got to be some sort of sick joke.
Talk about having only a hammer... Mr. Crockford nee
> On Sep 25, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Nick Warne wrote:
>
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:11 -0700
> Louis Santillan wrote:
>
>
>> infrastructure player (like a bank {PayPal}...
>
> Paypal isn't a bank.
>
It operates multiple banks. It depends on the legal definition of where it is
operating. It eve
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:23:11 -0700
Louis Santillan wrote:
> infrastructure player (like a bank {PayPal}...
Paypal isn't a bank.
Nick
--
"Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with
time travel, you never can tell."
-- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:44:33PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
>> Has anybody considered seif [0][1]?
>>
>> I disagree with the choice of nodejs & Qt, and the idea of capturing
>> entropy from microphone and camera are interesting but gam
Sylvain BERTRAND:
HTTPS CA concept is broken in itself, then adds unwanted complexity.
X.509 is bad design, but we can leave that for people that really don't
know any different - and it's still better than unauthenticated
cleartext.
Everyone else - the suckless crowd - can use certificate
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 08:54:39PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> I for one would love to see unencrypted communications on the internet die.
HTTPS CA concept is broken in itself, then adds unwanted complexity.
The middle grounds would be:
- to self-sign suckless certificate
- use a properly
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:44:33PM -0700, Louis Santillan wrote:
> Has anybody considered seif [0][1]?
>
> I disagree with the choice of nodejs & Qt, and the idea of capturing
> entropy from microphone and camera are interesting but gameable. I
> think the overall concept is viable.
>
> [0] (Repo
