On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 02:46:16PM -0700, Evan Gates wrote:
> > #ifndef __OpenBSD__
> > int pledge(const char *promises, const char *paths[]) { return 0; }
> > #endif
>
> Why the full function instead of
>
> #define pledge(x,y) 0
>
> (perhaps to enforce correct types?)
When using such trick
> #ifndef __OpenBSD__
> int pledge(const char *promises, const char *paths[]) { return 0; }
> #endif
Why the full function instead of
#define pledge(x,y) 0
(perhaps to enforce correct types?)
-emg
On Wed, 18 May 2016 18:50:15 +0200
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
Hey Kamil,
> Included are pledge(2) diffs for dwm, dmenu, st and slock. I've been
> testing these for a week now (both stress-tests and normal usage), and I
> have no ill effects to report.
I would never welcome this, but I'm glad to m
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:05:30AM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:54 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:12:31 -0800
> > Britton Kerin wrote:
> >
> > Hey Britton,
> >
> >> There are a couple problems:
> >
> > then fix them god damn it! Suckless is a group of peop
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:50:15PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This is purely OpenBSD-specific; had a brief look at SecComp and
> promptly ran away.
>
> Included are pledge(2) diffs for dwm, dmenu, st and slock. I've been
> testing these for a week now (both stress-tests and n
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> Independent of whether the functionality is desired, you probably want
> to implement it along the lines of:
>
> #ifndef __OpenBSD__
> int pledge(const char *promises, const char *paths[]) { return 0; }
> #endif
>
> This way you won't clutter all
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:50:15PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> +#if defined(__OpenBSD__)
> + if (pledge("stdio rpath dns unix prot_exec proc exec", NULL) < 0) {
> + die("pledge\n");
> + }
> +#endif
Independent of whether the functionality is desired, you probably want
to
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:54 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:12:31 -0800
> Britton Kerin wrote:
>
> Hey Britton,
>
>> There are a couple problems:
>
> then fix them god damn it! Suckless is a group of people who take
> matters into their own hands. Clone the dwm/wiki repos, fix the
> w
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Staven wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:12:31PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> The into page that did get me going was:
>> http://rhunter.org/blog/2012/04/17/dwm-a-tutorial-for-beginners/
>
> I was always under the impression that dwm was simply not meant for
>
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 03:58:02PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:51:08PM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> > > On the system I'm using that relies on PAM, my account doesn't have an
> > > entry in the local /etc/passwd file. Disabling getpw and related bits
> > > make
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 23:22, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:27:40PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> >> I think the vis editor alone is enough bloat in the suckless
> >> repositories.
> >
> > I don't know what vis has to d
Hi folks,
This is purely OpenBSD-specific; had a brief look at SecComp and
promptly ran away.
Included are pledge(2) diffs for dwm, dmenu, st and slock. I've been
testing these for a week now (both stress-tests and normal usage), and I
have no ill effects to report.
- st has been tortured with c
On Tue, 17 May 2016 16:12:31 -0800
Britton Kerin wrote:
Hey Britton,
> There are a couple problems:
then fix them god damn it! Suckless is a group of people who take
matters into their own hands. Clone the dwm/wiki repos, fix the
wording and submit a patch.
I'm positive you can make valuable c
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 04:12:31PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> The into page that did get me going was:
> http://rhunter.org/blog/2012/04/17/dwm-a-tutorial-for-beginners/
I was always under the impression that dwm was simply not meant for
the sort of people who don't know what a "terminal emulat
14 matches
Mail list logo
