> >i have no better idea than to exchange screenshots...
> >i checked on a virgin freshly installed browser, and linkedin showed me the
> >banner "PLEASE LOGIN!!!"
>
> That means that LinkedIn has variable behaviour.
> Probably dependent on client's IP-address.
> I have never seen in my different
>i have no better idea than to exchange screenshots...
>i checked on a virgin freshly installed browser, and linkedin showed me the
>banner "PLEASE LOGIN!!!"
That means that LinkedIn has variable behaviour.
Probably dependent on client's IP-address.
I have never seen in my different browsers (wit
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 19:27:02 +0300
stargr...@stargrave.org wrote:
> *** e...@bestmx.net [2015-12-13 19:24]:
> >> that link doesn't work. it requires logging in.
> >
> >i opened another browser,
> >i saw my profile, with full CV.
>
> It really requires to login, does not showing any profiles.
>
*** e...@bestmx.net [2015-12-13 19:24]:
>> that link doesn't work. it requires logging in.
>
>i opened another browser,
>i saw my profile, with full CV.
It really requires to login, does not showing any profiles.
> >> > I just realize that I have PLENTY of free time, 18 years of experience,
> >> > and
> >
> >> 18 years of experience doing *what*? :P
> >
> > linkedin.com/in/eugene-panferov-abab1ba2
> >
> that link doesn't work. it requires logging in.
i checked again, it works.
the big (half of the screen)
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 17:22:59 +0100
"e...@bestmx.net" wrote:
> > >> > I just realize that I have PLENTY of free time, 18
> > >> > years of experience, and
> > >
> > >> 18 years of experience doing *what*? :P
> > >
> > > linkedin.com/in/eugene-panferov-abab1ba2
>
> > that link doesn't work
> >> > I just realize that I have PLENTY of free time, 18 years of experience,
> >> > and
> >
> >> 18 years of experience doing *what*? :P
> >
> > linkedin.com/in/eugene-panferov-abab1ba2
> that link doesn't work. it requires logging in.
i opened another browser,
and visited this link.
i saw my p
that link doesn't work. it requires logging in.
On 12/13/15, e...@bestmx.net wrote:
>> > I just realize that I have PLENTY of free time, 18 years of experience,
>> > and
>
>> 18 years of experience doing *what*? :P
>
> linkedin.com/in/eugene-panferov-abab1ba2
>
>
>
if you want filtering and automatic ordering i can only repeat: use facebook.
if you want to retain your power, try to use the most general tools
possible to achieve exactly the filtering and ordering that you need.
we all already did that, but you say a standard (that says nothing
about it's impl
> > I just realize that I have PLENTY of free time, 18 years of experience, and
> 18 years of experience doing *what*? :P
linkedin.com/in/eugene-panferov-abab1ba2
> It is interesting to note that, often, when you don't like a certain tool
> as much as other person, the other person will automatically tell you
> that you don't know how to use it.
we here at suckless are marginal enough not to care about the
statistical analysis you made with stupid people ar
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 15:01:22 +0100
Mattias Andrée wrote:
> Well, I tried. I have submitted a bug report to
> the mailing list. I will stick with the mailing list.
> It is not too horrible when this is the only highly
> active mailing I am currently subscribed to.
You might also try out a mail cl
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:56:30 +0100
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Long story short -- if you favour NNTP use gmane.
Well, I tried. I have submitted a bug report to
the mailing list. I will stick with the mailing list.
It is not too horrible when this is the only highly
active mailing I am currently sub
Long story short -- if you favour NNTP use gmane.
We don't intend to move away from our mailing list approach.
Also bare in mind that we have a better mailing list archiving tool on
our wishlist for quite some time. Perhaps in the near future someone
will address this -- then it might be possible
One disadvantage with with NNTP is that the current
standard tools for sending packages are for e-mail
and mailing lists. Tools for NNTP has too be added.
Of course, you can always send patches manually.
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:23:27 + (UTC)
Black Rider wrote:
> El Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:35:27
El Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:50:50 +0100, hiro escribió:
> if your inbox is too small just use gmail for your mailing lists. i feel
> like it's just a different branding, both gmail and gmane do the same
> job to me.
It is not as much of a problem of inbox size as it is of having to deal
with a lot of
El Sun, 13 Dec 2015 11:35:27 +0100, FRIGN escribió:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:29:02 + (UTC)
> No, it's proof that you don't understand how to deal with IMAP. And
> regarding size: My _entire_ suckless inbox which reaches back nearly two
> years is only 68M, which is a joke.
> I'm sure Google d
mailing lists rock as much as it gets in the field.
and as a side note:
http://www.wired.com/2015/09/sorry-ello-real-anti-facebook-good-old-email/
cheers
--s
if your inbox is too small just use gmail for your mailing lists.
i feel like it's just a different branding, both gmail and gmane do
the same job to me.
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 10:29:02 + (UTC)
Black Rider wrote:
> In a regular mailing list, you are sent 100% of the traffic the mailing
> list gets. That is bad news for your INBOX storage limits. You can use
> smart filtering and scheduled INBOX cleanup, but the fact you are using
> tools for s
El Sat, 12 Dec 2015 22:13:06 +0100, hiro escribió:
> Anyways, I agree with you that mail isn't perfect, I don't know what big
> difference NNTP makes though.
I prefer NNTP for the following reasons:
You don't have to send subscribe or unsubscribe messages. If you want to
access the archives, yo
21 matches
Mail list logo
