Re: [dev] [st] expose cursor shape in config.def.h

2015-09-07 Thread Jan Christoph Ebersbach
Hi Christoph, Thank you for the hint. Attached is the patch in git format. Cheers, Jan Christoph On 09/07/2015 08:55 PM, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Greetings. > > On Mon, 07 Sep 2015 20:55:46 +0200 Jan Christoph Ebersbach > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just realized that st implements the cursor sh

Re: [dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-07 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2015-09-07 14:54 +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I assumed you'd use a signal, but I'm just wondering about your stop > script, can you share it? Currently my scripts are a mess and perhaps I should use some more standard solutions but here it goes: https://github.com/ypsu/desktop-configuration/

Re: [dev] [st] expose cursor shape in config.def.h

2015-09-07 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Mon, 07 Sep 2015 20:55:46 +0200 Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote: > Hi, > > I just realized that st implements the cursor shapes Block, IBeam and > Underline. It would be nice if the default cursor shape would be > configurable, i.e. because IBeam is a nice alternative to Block. > >

[dev] [st] expose cursor shape in config.def.h

2015-09-07 Thread Jan Christoph Ebersbach
Hi, I just realized that st implements the cursor shapes Block, IBeam and Underline. It would be nice if the default cursor shape would be configurable, i.e. because IBeam is a nice alternative to Block. The attached patch exposes cursor shape in config.def.h. Cheers, Jan Christoph -- Jan Chr

Re: [dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-07 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 7 September 2015 at 13:55, Balazs Kezes wrote: > On 2015-09-07 13:12 +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> How do you reflect the running init process that it should re-exec >> itself from your stop script? > > You mean how do I notify init? Well, I send it a signal. It should be > quite simple to do

Re: [dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-07 Thread Balazs Kezes
On 2015-09-07 13:12 +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > How do you reflect the running init process that it should re-exec > itself from your stop script? You mean how do I notify init? Well, I send it a signal. It should be quite simple to do this in sinit without a new signal: just get it reexec itse

Re: [dev] sinit umount problem

2015-09-07 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 6 September 2015 at 16:07, Balazs Kezes wrote: > Still, I've added a workaround to this in my setup just in case: before > I unmount the drives, I get init to reexec itself so that it is not > holding references to deleted files. I added a command line argument to > skip the initscripts and jum