Anselm R Garbe said:
> I see a lot of opportunity in a decent C-only compiler. Not sure if
> OpenBSD achieved anything wrt its pcc porting efforts that Uriel once
> pushed for.
It was not pcc effort, and it is not even in OpenBSD source tree any
more. The project's site¹ says it is mostly complet
On 24 November 2014 at 06:35, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> Well, there's always clang. It's completely written in C++, but is way
> better organized than GCC and it is contained entirely in a lib, so it
> can be easily integrated into IDEs and other programs. If you need a C
> parser, have a look at l
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:20:44PM +, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
Holy shit, yes! Ever tried to compile it?
And in the end, GCC has a lot of optimizers that make pedantic
asumptions about the code they compile. For instance, if i is of signe
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:39:07AM +, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a video player (mplayer) installed on my computer with a lot of
> codecs, so it is able to play a lot of videos formats.
> I don't like the idea of installing some plugins like gstreamer to play
> vide on on the bro
I use extension DownloadHelper for Firefox then play movie file with
mplayer. You can also inspect the source of the HTML page as the full
URL of the video is often there (usually ends with .mp4 or .flv). Many
video players will work with an http URL so you don't need an extra
download step.
On
On 23/11/2014, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> So what do you think, GCC is ok?
No.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00193.html
If I want to see politics trump technics, I watch CPAC.
tcc is actively maintained. i dont see a reason for forking it, see
tinycc-devel mailing at nongnu.org
this is the repo: http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
On 11/23/2014 11:20 PM, Henrique Lengler wrote:
Hi,
What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
I'm asking because I don't find too much on
On 23 November 2014 at 17:20, Henrique Lengler
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
> I'm asking because I don't find too much on suckless site about it
> I don't have experience in any other compiler.
>
> I also found someday TCC (Tiny C compiler - bellard.org/tcc/)
> A
Hi,
What is the situation of GCC, is it bloated?
I'm asking because I don't find too much on suckless site about it
I don't have experience in any other compiler.
I also found someday TCC (Tiny C compiler - bellard.org/tcc/)
And it looks cool.
The site shows the speed of it:
CompilerTi
Applied, thanks!
Also, now that we are using {sym,}linkat, implement the trivial -L and
-P options.
---
ln.1 | 11 +--
ln.c | 53 ++---
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ln.1 b/ln.1
index 4205ea7..3b1ac98 100644
--- a/ln.1
+++ b
Applied thanks.
The usage line in the manpage will have to be updated
but I am planning to rewrite the manpage to fit the new style
as that of grep.1 or kill.1.
---
sort.1 | 11 +++
sort.c | 57 +++--
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sort.1 b/sort.1
index 12fb95d..71c8154 100644
--- a/sort.1
+++ b/sort.1
@@ -15,9 +15,20 @@ writes the sorted concatenation of the giv
Hi,
On 22 November 2014 at 01:19, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> someone asked tonight why he couldn't use his dwm keybindings when using is
> SDL2 application in fullscreen.
> After investigation it seems that SDL uses _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK to check
> if
> the window manager can handle fullscreen.
14 matches
Mail list logo
