POSIX defines a text file as: 3.397 Text File
A file that contains characters organized into zero or more lines. The
lines do not contain NUL characters and none can exceed {LINE_MAX}
bytes in length, including the character. Although
POSIX.1-2008 does not distinguish between text files and binar
Henrique Lengler wrote:
> So I just thought, is there a way to combine both, my web browser that will
> care only about display the html stuff, and leave the video work to my
> video player? This would be awesome.
Heyho,
you can use youtube-dl to download embedded videos from many sites or play
Hi,
I have a video player (mplayer) installed on my computer with a lot of
codecs, so it is able to play a lot of videos formats.
I don't like the idea of installing some plugins like gstreamer to play
vide on on the browser if have a video player already working.
This is the Unix philosophy: Wri
Hi,
someone asked tonight why he couldn't use his dwm keybindings when using is
SDL2 application in fullscreen.
After investigation it seems that SDL uses _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK to check if
the window manager can handle fullscreen.
Here is a patch implementing it, I'm not sure if I cleared the X
>From 028f613d08a264a75b58adfaac758fadeae4c51a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sin
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:54:31 +
Subject: [PATCH] Remove .hgtags
---
.hgtags | 73 -
1 file changed, 73 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 .hgtags
> Er, by "permission" I meant it doesn't make the _implementation_
> non-compliant.
No, it doesn-t make cthe compiler non-complaint, but it makes your
code non complaint.
> And implementation-defined is not the same as undefined.
I perfectly know it, but in this case it is not exactly said
if
https://youtu.be/nEF_-IcnQC4
sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> microkernel is beautiful
Beauty might be the only property superior to monolithic.
* koneu 2014-11-21 13:22
> + microkernel is inferior to monolithic in almost all aspects
microkernel is beautiful
--s
+ microkernel is inferior to monolithic in almost all aspects
On 21 November 2014 12:07, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> In my personal opinion Minix is no foundation to build on. There is a
> reason why Linux Torvalds with his 'hobby project' got much more thrust
> from the community than Andrew. S. Tanenbaum with his professional work.
Not sure if Tanenbaum's m
Hi.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 06:25:13PM -0800, Charles Thorley wrote:
> I find Minix3 to be extremely interesting, and attractive (at least in
> principle).
The advantages of Minix are purely theoretical. All the different
servers can be restarted when they crash, but that does not make the
caus
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:40:13AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Hi Evan,
> >
> > I'd prefer to stick to the existing makefile. It might be scary to
> > say that it depends on GNU make but bear in mind that of all the make
> > implementations I've tried only OpenBSD make had some tro
Nick wrote:
> Great, I'm glad to see this, thanks for it. The opera inspired browser hiro
> posted to the list reminded me of this functionality, actually, and it's a
> good step towards more general customisable settings per website (e.g.
> cookies, javascript), as Christoph suggested a while ago.
k...@shike2.com writes:
> > I'd prefer to stick to the existing makefile. It might be scary to
> > say that it depends on GNU make but bear in mind that of all the make
> > implementations I've tried only OpenBSD make had some trouble with it.
>
> I think we should remove the GNU make dependence,
Hi,
> Hi Evan,
>
> I'd prefer to stick to the existing makefile. It might be scary to
> say that it depends on GNU make but bear in mind that of all the make
> implementations I've tried only OpenBSD make had some trouble with it.
I think we should remove the GNU make dependence, because we don
18 matches
Mail list logo
