> Why shouldn't a non-login shell have a utmp session? And if this option
> is to use a login shell, rather than merely using utmp, then I don't
> think it should be a compile-time option - just because someone
> sometimes wants a login shell (which could be done before, if desired,
> by running e
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014, at 03:48, k...@shike2.com wrote:
> And the profile runs in the same tty that st opens. St by default
> executes a non login shell, so profile is not loaded, but utmp executes
> a login shell (because it creates the utmp session, so it is more
> logical for it to execute a log
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014, at 04:07, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>> Value of erase key for example, or in general the configuration
>> of line kernel driver
>
> These can't come from the profile either; since st opens a new tty that
> is not the same device the user logged in on.
And the profile runs in
