---
st.c | 63 ---
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/st.c b/st.c
index 097775d..dd3301b 100644
--- a/st.c
+++ b/st.c
@@ -3459,39 +3459,40 @@ xdrawcursor(void) {
xdraws(term.line[oldy][oldx].c, term.li
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> It was designed that way because Mod+n should always focus the n-th
> window, i.e. the one with #n in the title, in the current layout.
Now it makes perfect sense, thanks for replying!
I mostly use dvtm for the scrollback and se
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:31:41AM -0300, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:24:38PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> > The question is: Does your patch fix the behaviour
> > in your eyes?
>
> Yes, mostly.
>
> I must ask it because it may be this way by design, I don't
> know why, though.
I
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:24:38PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> The question is: Does your patch fix the behaviour
> in your eyes?
Yes, mostly.
I must ask it because it may be this way by design, I don't
know why, though.
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:16:39 -0300
Amadeus Folego wrote:
> Oh, sorry! That was totally by mistake.
>
> Is there anything I can do to fix this?
The question is: Does your patch fix the behaviour
in your eyes?
btw: I love your music.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 05:31:07PM +0200, koneu wrote:
> Why did you call the thread "Re:"?
Oh, sorry! That was totally by mistake.
Is there anything I can do to fix this?
