[dev] [st][PATCH] Remove indentation level in xdrawcursor

2014-09-08 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
--- st.c | 63 --- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/st.c b/st.c index 097775d..dd3301b 100644 --- a/st.c +++ b/st.c @@ -3459,39 +3459,40 @@ xdrawcursor(void) { xdraws(term.line[oldy][oldx].c, term.li

Re: [dev] Re: [dvtm] Focus by id instead of order

2014-09-08 Thread Amadeus Folego
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote: > It was designed that way because Mod+n should always focus the n-th > window, i.e. the one with #n in the title, in the current layout. Now it makes perfect sense, thanks for replying! I mostly use dvtm for the scrollback and se

Re: [dev] Re: [dvtm] Focus by id instead of order

2014-09-08 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 09:31:41AM -0300, Amadeus Folego wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:24:38PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > > The question is: Does your patch fix the behaviour > > in your eyes? > > Yes, mostly. > > I must ask it because it may be this way by design, I don't > know why, though. I

Re: [dev] Re: [dvtm] Focus by id instead of order

2014-09-08 Thread Amadeus Folego
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:24:38PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > The question is: Does your patch fix the behaviour > in your eyes? Yes, mostly. I must ask it because it may be this way by design, I don't know why, though.

Re: [dev] Re: [dvtm] Focus by id instead of order

2014-09-08 Thread FRIGN
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:16:39 -0300 Amadeus Folego wrote: > Oh, sorry! That was totally by mistake. > > Is there anything I can do to fix this? The question is: Does your patch fix the behaviour in your eyes? btw: I love your music. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN

Re: [dev] Re: [dvtm] Focus by id instead of order

2014-09-08 Thread Amadeus Folego
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 05:31:07PM +0200, koneu wrote: > Why did you call the thread "Re:"? Oh, sorry! That was totally by mistake. Is there anything I can do to fix this?