On 08/19, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> sic or ii as IRC client? whats the purpouse of each one?
>
sic works out of the box, but isn't extensible and doesn't have anything fancy
features like colored output. ii requires more time and effort to set up, but is
more flexible. You can use 'tail -f', an o
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:55:43PM -0400, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> In your case, apparently, to test the user's understanding of the
> Unix I/O concept!
> --
> Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
I know this type of tool can be very usefull in a lot of situations, but
not to be used as a IRC client a
Quoth Henrique Lengler on Tue, Aug 19 2014 20:16 -0300:
Looks like none of them. I tried sic, very poor.
sic or ii as IRC client? whats the purpouse of each one?
In your case, apparently, to test the user's understanding of the
Unix I/O concept!
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
Looks like none of them. I tried sic, very poor.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:04:54PM -0300, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> sic or ii as IRC client? whats the purpouse of each one?
--
Henrique Lengler
https://gitorious.org/~henriqueleng
sic or ii as IRC client? whats the purpouse of each one?
--
Henrique Lengler
https://gitorious.org/~henriqueleng
Good luck.
On 8/17/14, 7:38 PM, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> Well, as you may notice it's quite important for some people to get this
> message through. You should be glad that there are people who give
> advice. This advice is, once again: Don't use OSX, don't port good
> software to OSX (and Windows).
Sorr
Greetings!
Sorry for reviving old thread, but what happened to porting surf to
GTK3?
There was a discussion in January 2014, where Christoph Lohmann said:
> Are there any arguments against switching to GTK3? Otherwise I will
> switch surf to GTK3 using the smootscrolling patch.
surf still
