See also: https://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Ok, thank you guys! :)
I will test it. Now that I'm thinking of it, detach may be very useful.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQJCBAEBCgAsBQJTsk7qJRxEaW1pdHJpcyBaZXJ2YXMgPGR6ZXJ2YXNAZHplcnZh
cy5ncj4ACgkQ+77hPkfJypadZxAAiK868ywu19z
On Mon 30 Jun 2014 at 17:48:48 PDT Dimitris Zervas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
subject).
I don't use either of
On July 1, 2014 2:48:48 AM CEST, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
>Why not use tabbed? or DWM's mono-view (how is it called when you see
>only 1 window?)?
What's DWM?
Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> Why not use tabbed? or DWM's mono-view (how is it called when you see only 1
> window?)?
For local work on my laptop I use tabbed. Only sometimes for updates (to catch
error messages from the beginning) I need a scrollback and therefore fire up an
instance of tmux. Actuall
On 07/01/2014 06:18 AM, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
>
> After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
> screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
> subject).
> Why is that? For the tabs?
> Why not use tabbed? or DWM's mono-view (how is it c
I uses tmux for remote development. My main dev machine is on
datacenter, and all my development environment is set on the machine.
With tmux I can persist my dev session across various terminals, like
my laptops, desktops, even on phone when there is an urgent issue.
It also works well with remov
-BEGIN RSA SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello,
>
> After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
> screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, tha
On 07/01, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello,
>
> After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
> screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
> subject).
> Why is that? For the tabs?
> W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
After a year or so in the list, I think each and every one is using tmux or
screen (I think more tmux, but do not start a war please, that's not the
subject).
Why is that? For the tabs?
Why not use tabbed? or DWM's mono-view (how is it call
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On June 30, 2014 7:20:26 PM EEST, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
>* Dimitris Zervas 2014-06-30 11:35
>> I am thinking of trying to implement vim key bindings one of these
>days (I can't work otherwise).
>
>that'd be great.
>
>including modes?
>
>--s_
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 05:34:50PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:25:13 +0100
> Maxime Coste wrote:
>
> > Being written in C++11 (and depending on boost until the standard C++ regex
> > library gets widely available), it will probably not please everyone in the
> > suckless comunity
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Lee Fallat wrote:
> This may not be an alternative to VIM, but it is inspired by its
> ancestor vi, and other editors like ed, sam, and acme. It is a
> graphical text editor. The main reason why I choose graphical is
> because TUIs are just a hack of GUIs. Seriousl
Hello suckless fans,
This may not be an alternative to VIM, but it is inspired by its
ancestor vi, and other editors like ed, sam, and acme. It is a
graphical text editor. The main reason why I choose graphical is
because TUIs are just a hack of GUIs. Seriously, look at the
screenshots posted at t
On 30/06/14, Markus Teich wrote:
Heyho,
Hello there,
since I did not find any suckless project regarding this issue, I
would like to ask you guys for some feedback:
unsigned char *msg;
size_t msg_size;
struct foo *msg_data;
struct bar *msg_signature;
msg_size = sizeof(unsigned char)
Heyho,
since I did not find any suckless project regarding this issue, I would like to
ask you guys for some feedback:
unsigned char *msg;
size_t msg_size;
struct foo *msg_data;
struct bar *msg_signature;
msg_size = sizeof(unsigned char)// op
+ sizeof(struct foo)// data
* Dimitris Zervas 2014-06-30 11:35
> I am thinking of trying to implement vim key bindings one of these days (I
> can't work otherwise).
that'd be great.
including modes?
--s_
Quoth M Farkas-Dyck:
> On 30/06/2014, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > Better than link-numbering using numbers is the link-enumeration using
> > characters on the homerow on the keyboard:
> >
> > Page 1[aa] 2[ab] 3[js]...
>
> One would have to configure which characters are on the home row; 'b'
> is not
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:31:31PM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> More like knowing how you want to read your emails.
> Anyway, you could send a personal email. Not that anything is going to
> change...
This is about readability yes.
You obviously don't care to make it easy for others to read
y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On June 29, 2014 7:42:48 PM EEST, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 06:13:30PM +0300, Dimitris Zervas wrote:
>> >Wrap your lines.
>> I am happy that you break the discussion, every time for the same
>thing :)
>
>Knowing how to writ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
>I can't really use the marking feature and needed to get used to the
>fact that it will remove all the input instead of the last character
>on backspace, and I could never memorize many of the keyboard
>shortcuts beyond ^X / ^C...
I am thinking of t
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 15:58:03 +0100
> Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>
>> BTW, we have sandy[2] too, which admittedly needs some more love.
>
> I love sandy and have been using it for a while! With some more work
> this could really become a really good
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>
> I don't really see the point of editors that use a terminal-based,
> clickable UI. If you want that, you can just use a regular-GUI-based
> editor like gedit, kate etc.
>
I know how much suck comes with GUI editors, but I switched from ged
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:53 AM, M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> On 30/06/2014, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> Better than link-numbering using numbers is the link-enumeration using
>> characters on the homerow on the keyboard:
>>
>> Page 1[aa] 2[ab] 3[js]...
>
> One would have to configure which characters are o
On 30/06/2014, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Better than link-numbering using numbers is the link-enumeration using
> characters on the homerow on the keyboard:
>
> Page 1[aa] 2[ab] 3[js]...
One would have to configure which characters are on the home row; 'b'
is not on mine.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
wrote:
> Quoth Nick on Sun, Jun 29 2014 19:56 -0400:
>
>> Quoth Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe:
>>>
>>> Beyond rendering pages, the biggest
>>> challenge seems to me to lie in coming up with a more intelligent
>>> method of selecting links than the
26 matches
Mail list logo
