I probably discovered why this happens.
The WM_DELETE_WINDOW command is being received with success, I tested
it.
The issue is that the command xmonad uses to spawn st double-forks the
process, making the SIGHUP signal not being sent to the correct pid. See
[1].
So the question remains if we sho
There is wrong information about the installation directory and about
how to run quark in the README.
>From d8a3795aef804715fee2e367cba4f843bcd4b2da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakob Kramer
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:43:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] correct information in README
---
README | 5 +++
On 10 April 2014 14:21, Charlie Kester wrote:
> (Oh joy, another thread about posting etiquette!)
> On Thu 10 Apr 2014 at 10:13:49 PDT Louis Santillan wrote:
>>
>> When someone invents a monitor that supports displaying content that
>> is below the fold, first, I'll stop top posting.
>
>
> Display
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:08:51PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> > 1. If you open a program like mutt, ssh, or newsbeuter and kill the
> > window with the wm (like xmonad) the process will not be killed.
>
> I think it is a bug, because in this case a SIGHUP should be sent to the
> p
(Oh joy, another thread about posting etiquette!)
On Thu 10 Apr 2014 at 10:13:49 PDT Louis Santillan wrote:
When someone invents a monitor that supports displaying content that
is below the fold, first, I'll stop top posting.
Displaying content below the fold is only an issue when people fail
> 1. If you open a program like mutt, ssh, or newsbeuter and kill the
> window with the wm (like xmonad) the process will not be killed.
I think it is a bug, because in this case a SIGHUP should be sent to the
process. How do you kill the terminal?
> 2. When installing packages with yaourt it han
> > No answer? Anyone have anything to say? It is a big change, and
> > if nobody say anything then I will change it.
>
> Don't top post.
Christoph, you know that I never top post, I hate it, but in this case,
the mail was a reminder of my own previous mail, so I did a top post in
order to allow
I think if you are having trouble reading you should put on some glasses
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
On 10 April 2014 13:23, koneu wrote:
> On April 10, 2014 7:20:56 PM CEST, Calvin Morrison
> wrote:
>>I suggest a simple solution, once and for all. simply stop reading
>>email all together
>>
>>->
On April 10, 2014 7:20:56 PM CEST, Calvin Morrison
wrote:
>I suggest a simple solution, once and for all. simply stop reading
>email all together
>
>-> get a life, get up and go out, stop bitching about some random
>internet people not posting in your preferred format, get laid, get a
>job, relax
I suggest a simple solution, once and for all. simply stop reading
email all together
-> get a life, get up and go out, stop bitching about some random
internet people not posting in your preferred format, get laid, get a
job, relax, chill <-
On 10 April 2014 13:13, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.n
Greetings.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:13:07 +0200 Louis Santillan wrote:
> When someone invents a monitor that supports displaying content that
> is below the fold, first, I'll stop top posting.
Noone cares for you, you are just a peasant.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
When someone invents a monitor that supports displaying content that
is below the fold, first, I'll stop top posting.
Hi Guys,
I wanted some help to understand some things that happen with me using
st 0.5 that are kinda new, (coming from urxvt and other terms), these are:
1. If you open a program like mutt, ssh, or newsbeuter and kill the
window with the wm (like xmonad) the process will not be killed.
2. When
but i dont care abotu other people because i am selfish and lazy. why
don't you get a client that supports top posting??? bottom posting is
not suckless! /s
On 10 April 2014 11:48, koneu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> Don't top post.
>
> Bee
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Don't top post.
Been thinking this way too often recently. If your client does not allow
you to write _below_ the quoted message, get a different mail client. If
it _needs_ to be browser based, use ZOHO or something like it.
I pushed the rewritten version
http://github.com/mutantturkey/lock
On 10 April 2014 07:02, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:46:08 +0200
> hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If one day you discover this script to be some bottleneck in your
>> webscale world-changing app then you can still t
Greetings.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:03:55 +0200 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> No answer? Anyone have anything to say? It is a big change, and
> if nobody say anything then I will change it.
Don't top post.
> > Well, I am going to comment why I want to change the behaviour of
> > this ke
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:39:23 +0200
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" wrote:
> No answer? Anyone have anything to say? It is a big change, and
> if nobody say anything then I will change it.
Hey Robert,
sorry for not responding. I planned on expressing my opinion on this
topic earlier, but this got
> >> Changes 0 to False.
> >
> > Forgot patch.
>
> This patch cleans up a style inconsistency.
Thanks, I will apply it next week.
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> I don't like this alt screen thing, but when
> allowaltscreen == 0, the cursor is still saved
> and restored after calling 'less' (or 'man').
>
> This patch makes allowaltscreen == 1 usable.
Good catch, but I think it makes allowaltscreen == 0 usable, does it?
Regards,
--
Roberto E. Vargas C
No answer? Anyone have anything to say? It is a big change, and
if nobody say anything then I will change it.
Regards,
> Well, I am going to comment why I want to change the behaviour of
> this key. When ascii was defined in 1968 communication with computers
> were done using punched cards, or h
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:46:08 +0200
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If one day you discover this script to be some bottleneck in your
> webscale world-changing app then you can still take the time and
> rewrite it in C, or create your own CPU with an instruction set
> extension that does just that
If one day you discover this script to be some bottleneck in your
webscale world-changing app then you can still take the time and
rewrite it in C, or create your own CPU with an instruction set
extension that does just that, whatever crazyness is needed to get to
the super important sub nano-secon
Here is my version of search engine and homepage patch. its pretty simple.
http://koti.kapsi.fi/~deferi/patches/surf-0.6-searchengine.diff
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:57 AM, wrote:
>> Bigby James said:
>>> On 04/09, hiro wrote:
>>
>> Please
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:57 AM, wrote:
> Bigby James said:
>> On 04/09, hiro wrote:
>
> Please, don't feed trolls.
>
Well at least they're right about the Admins. They'll switch to
systemd as soon as both the software comes with a *.service file only
and their self-hacked initscripts breaking.
25 matches
Mail list logo
