Re: [dev] Surf hacking. Search Engine and Homepage

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:18:32PM -0300, Henrique Lengler wrote: > I downloaded and i installed the patch how is described on the website! > > I received this message: > > # patch -p1 < /home/henrique/surf-0.6-searchengines.diff > patching file config.def.h > Hunk #1 FAILED at 101. > 1 out of 1

Re: [dev] Surf hacking. Search Engine and Homepage

Greetings. On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 19:17:18 +0200 Henrique Lengler wrote: > I received this message: > > # patch -p1 < /home/henrique/surf-0.6-searchengines.diff > patching file config.def.h > Hunk #1 FAILED at 101. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file config.def.h.rej > patching fil

Re: [dev] Surf hacking. Search Engine and Homepage

Hi, I entered in suckless surf webpage i didn't found a patch for homepage for surf 6.0. But i found it for search engine. I downloaded and i installed the patch how is described on the website! I received this message: # patch -p1 < /home/henrique/surf-0.6-searchengines.diff patching file co

Re: [dev] lock (1) - a dead simple lock script

Was not aware of flock, thanks! I agree with you, using more small shell scripts is preferable. On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote: > On 8 April 2014 12:19, Amadeus Folego wrote: > > Hi Calvin, > > > > Thanks for sharing it, it's really neat! > > > > I have the same

Re: [dev] lock (1) - a dead simple lock script

On 8 April 2014 12:19, Amadeus Folego wrote: > Hi Calvin, > > Thanks for sharing it, it's really neat! > > I have the same problem with some cron jobs, but I use lockrun[1]. > > It's source code is quite simple[2] too. That code is simple enough, but it did leave a poor taste in my mouth. A clean

Re: [dev] lock (1) - a dead simple lock script

Hi Calvin, Thanks for sharing it, it's really neat! I have the same problem with some cron jobs, but I use lockrun[1]. It's source code is quite simple[2] too. The reason why I would still stick with lockrun is that in the context of cron jobs, it is better that the task does not runs than pili

[dev] lock (1) - a dead simple lock script

Hi, I've just written lock, a simple little script to ensure that two programs won't run at once. I am using this to ensure my users don't overwrite the same shared folder in a set of genomic analysis scripts. I thought it might be useful. The script will either create the lock and exit, or ping

Re: [dev] [st] [patch] typedefs instead of #defines

> -#define Rectangle XRectangle > ... > - Rectangle r; > + XRectangle r; You remove the define at all in this point, and if I remember well, this define was needed to avoid something. Maybe Christoph can talk a bit more about this, because I think he was who write these defines. Regards

Re: [dev] Surf hacking. Search Engine and Homepage

Henrique Lengler wrote: > Hi, this is my first time in the mailing list, so, i don't know how to > efficiently > use this! > > I'm trying to set up a homepage and a searchengine on my surf web browser. > But i > can't understand the official wiki. I added those lines in my config.h > > #define

[dev] [PATCH] fix typo in manpage

--- Heyho, just a small typo. --Markus surf.1 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/surf.1 b/surf.1 index 1530ec6..f798ebd 100644 --- a/surf.1 +++ b/surf.1 @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ Copies current URI to primary selection. Show the sourcecode of the current page. .T

[dev] [meta] DMARC interoperation

Since I started paying attention to my DMARC results recently, I noticed that this mailing list does not play nice with DMARC. Is there any chance to act as a strict forwarder or (at the very least) Original-Authentication-Results? Right now DMARC will always fail on mails forwarded from this list.