Eric Pruitt said:
> I may be missing it, but I don't see anything on the site that governs
> what license contributors' content falls under, so I'm wondering: what
> license do patches and other contributions submitted to the wiki fall
> under?
I would assume that contributed patches are under the
I may be missing it, but I don't see anything on the site that governs
what license contributors' content falls under, so I'm wondering: what
license do patches and other contributions submitted to the wiki fall
under?
Eric
> I just remembered about the deck layout [1], it's another example of a
I think deck like layouts are, in general, a bad idea. I'd implemented
a generalization of deck as part of a previous version of my xtile
patch that I ultimately decided to ditch. I don't want to repeat here
what I've already
On Mon 17 Feb 2014 at 09:21:28 PST Calvin Morrison wrote:
I'm not sure why tabbed exist when it's a window management feature.
for example i3, a tiling window manager supports tabs as part of it's
stacking methods. (see attachment)
What's the rational reason for it to exist, other than dwm needs
Nick said:
> Interesting. How do you handle things like ldflags and cflags for
> specific libraries? Are they just all listed in the central
> config.mk, with more lines added when an application is added that
> needs them?
You might have a look at BSD's ports infrastructure: there is some
single
Hello,
Anyone using tabbed as their primary window manager?
If so, do you tab your tabs?
How far does the rabbit hole go?
Regards,
Lee
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 17 February 2014 20:26, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> dwm has extremely limited stacking which is le
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:21:53PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Exactly. I would even go a bit further than that. When designing my
> stali Makefile's, I only have a single config.mk in a central place,
> but many Makefiles for each dependency that include the central
> config.mk
Interesting. Ho
On 11 February 2014 14:32, Kurt Van Dijck
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:41:43AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
>> Regarding the config.mk, I don't see the benefit, either.
>
> The major benefit I see is:
> config.mk is build/host/target specific, Makefile is not.
> Makefile goes into versioning, config
Hi Hiltjo,
On 16 February 2014 15:39, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> I would like to send a couple of patches for quark. I made more
> changes to quark for my own purposes, but I thought the below changes
> might be useful for the suckless quark aswell :) . Feel free to apply
> any patch (or none) you
On 17 February 2014 20:26, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> dwm has extremely limited stacking which is less efficient (in terms
> of user interaction not computer performance) then i3's tree based
> model, which allows substacking quite easily.
dwm has this limitation by design. dwm consists of two win
On 17.02.2014 18:21, Calvin Morrison wrote:
I'm not sure why tabbed exist when it's a window management feature.
for example i3, a tiling window manager supports tabs as part of it's
stacking methods. (see attachment)
What's the rational reason for it to exist, other than dwm needs to
stay under
11 matches
Mail list logo
