Sorry please disregard last mail, again I corrected some
inconsistencies in my patch.
This one is ok.
0001-deprecating-signal-populate-popup-for-context-menu.patch
Description: Binary data
He is another one for signals populate-popup/context-menu.
I'm not sure that is really necessary, but here, it's done.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:15:13 +0100 Quentin Rameau wrote:
>> As the subject of the mail t
Eckehard Berns dixit:
>I actually use ctrl-alt-del and alt-up from time to time :) But I could
>live without it. Hmm, I actually forgot. Do the BSDs handle ctrl-alt-del
>in any way on x86?
Yes. Not just on x86. It sends SIGUSR1 to pid 1.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
> Hi, does anyone sell openbsd sticke
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:41:09PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hm, isn’t Ctrl-Alt-Backspace+Ctrl-Alt-Del (when not using xdm)
> or Ctrl-Alt-F1+Ctrl-Alt-Del the normal way to shutdown a system?
I actually use ctrl-alt-del and alt-up from time to time :) But I could
live without it. Hmm, I actua
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:54:44PM +, sin wrote:
> Hm yes, you are right, the FIFO code never reaps children. We could
> probably use the double fork trick + killing the parent to force it to
> be reaped by the original process (the parent of the FIFO code).
Double forking would take care of
sin writes:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
> init[2].
>
> It is currently controlled via a FIFO. It supports only two commands (reboot
> and poweroff).
>
> It follows the
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:03:38PM +0100, Hadrian Węgrzynowski wrote:
> Dnia 2014-02-06, o godz. 12:32:59
> Hey.
>
> Did you saw qinit[1] from David Galos?
Yes, it does a bit more than what I'd expect from init.
It is also a bit racy, I have a patched version somewhere that sort of
works.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:36:23PM +0100, Eckehard Berns wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:32:59PM +, sin wrote:
> > As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> > busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
> > init[2].
> > [...]
> > Let
Eckehard Berns dixit:
>Also, would it be worth it to deal with x86 Linux's ctrl-alt-del? It would
>pull in OS specific code, and maybe people don't care for ctrl-alt-del
>on the console, since everybody lives in X anyway.
Hm, isn’t Ctrl-Alt-Backspace+Ctrl-Alt-Del (when not using xdm)
or Ctrl-Alt-
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:32:59PM +, sin wrote:
> As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
> init[2].
> [...]
> Let me know what you guys think, I am looking forward to use this with sta.li.
Dnia 2014-02-06, o godz. 12:32:59
sin napisał(a):
> Hi all,
>
> As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on
> Strake's init[2].
>
> It is currently controlled via a FIFO. It supports only two commands
> (
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:54:17PM +0100, YpN wrote:
> > Let me know what you guys think, I am looking forward to use this with
> > sta.li.
>
> I will probably try it this month. And you should add it on
> the "rocks" page. For now, I don't have any advices, but it
> could be good to "support" da
Good evening,
sin wrote:
> As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
> init[2].
This is a wonderful idea. Few months ago, we talked about a
"suckless" init. I am happy to see something new (and n
Greetings.
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014 19:15:13 +0100 Quentin Rameau wrote:
> As the subject of the mail tells, this is a simple signal handling
> adjustment for page title modification.
The patch has been applied. Thanks for sending it.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
As the subject of the mail tells, this is a simple signal handling
adjustment for page title modification.
0001-deprecating-signal-title-changed-for-notify-title.patch
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:46:43PM +0100, Eckehard Berns wrote:
> > As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> > busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
> > init[2].
> >
> > It is currently controlled via a FIFO. It supports only two com
> As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
> busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
> init[2].
>
> It is currently controlled via a FIFO. It supports only two commands (reboot
> and poweroff).
Why are those included? sinit does nothing
Hi all,
As part of experimenting with a toy distro I wanted to get rid of
busybox's init, so I hacked together sinit[1]. sinit is based on Strake's
init[2].
It is currently controlled via a FIFO. It supports only two commands (reboot
and poweroff).
It follows the classic style of config.def.h
18 matches
Mail list logo
