On 2013-06-18 22:04, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Jens Staal dixit:
I am looking at Alpine at the moment... uclibc/busybox based
That is precisely the thing I was *not* addressing by stating
“company-use” ☺
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve started toying with something musl too,
but for “at work” you don’
Hi there,
right now sta.li isn't reachable, because the main DNS server is down
for some reason.
This should be resolved within the next hour or two.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Best regards,
Anselm
> > Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> > yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
>
> I can understand why this crowd is afraid of systemd, but being afraid
> of the /usr move stuff just baffles me.
There's worse.
http://jasonwryan.com/blog/2013/06/15/askin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:38:45PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Jens Staal dixit:
>
> >> How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
>
> > That depends on how you define "working".
>
> Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> yet? May call
Jens Staal dixit:
> I am looking at Alpine at the moment... uclibc/busybox based
That is precisely the thing I was *not* addressing by stating
“company-use” ☺
Don’t get me wrong, I’ve started toying with something musl too,
but for “at work” you don’t want that, or can’t justify it, or
whatever.
> Jens Staal dixit:
> > That depends on how you define "working".
>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:38:45PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
> yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
Last I spoke to strake, starch wasn't really ready yet.
On tis 18 jun 2013 21:38:45, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Jens Staal dixit:
How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
That depends on how you define "working".
Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
Indee
Jens Staal dixit:
>> How does someone use that package on a working Linux distribution?
> That depends on how you define "working".
Did nobody fork Arch from before it became poettering’d and UsrMove’d
yet? May call it Hintern Linux ;-)
Indeed, I see a serious problem should Debian also fall, b
Hi,
Squashed the two other patches together.
Thanks,
stateless
0001-Add-expand-1.patch
Description: Binary data
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:41:29AM -0400, Galos, David wrote:
> > Implemented comm(1). I have not tested this very thoroughly so take it with
> > a grain of salt.
>
> Dangit! You beat me to it! I wrote this just last night, and was about
> to make the manpage.
Damn! I have not looked at your im
> Maybe now?
I would:
* submit as a patch
* write a manpage
* add usage
* eprintf something upon failure.
On 18 June 2013 11:59, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> Maybe now?
I had just remembered the sbase project when I saw some other posts,
and remembered also when I was learning C my futile attempt at core
utils called core-futiles. The quality is poor
Now I know better.
Calvin
Maybe now?
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
char *login;
login = getlogin();
if (!login)
return 1;
puts(login);
return 0;
}
Damn it, without the semicolon now.
/* See LICENSE file for copyright and license details. */
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
char *login;
login = getlogin();
if (!login)
return 1;
puts(login);
return 0;
};
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:31:13AM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> is there an interest in having the logname tool?
>
> I have a basic implementation of it here:
>
> https://github.com/mutantturkey/corefutiles/blob/master/logname.c
Some personal comments:
* Weird indentation. What coding style i
is there an interest in having the logname tool?
I have a basic implementation of it here:
https://github.com/mutantturkey/corefutiles/blob/master/logname.c
Do we care about dependencies? I only have and
but I also use puts() and it doesn't have a usage. Essentially five
minute of work once I
On 2013-06-18 16:58, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:58:58 +0200 Jens Staal wrote:
I have no idea if anyone is interested, but a large part of sbase built
with the open watcom compiler using its included (rather limited)
c-library... mostly for fun.
https://aur.arc
Greetings.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:58:58 +0200 Jens Staal wrote:
> I have no idea if anyone is interested, but a large part of sbase built
> with the open watcom compiler using its included (rather limited)
> c-library... mostly for fun.
>
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sbase-ow-git/
I have no idea if anyone is interested, but a large part of sbase built
with the open watcom compiler using its included (rather limited)
c-library... mostly for fun.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sbase-ow-git/
> Implemented comm(1). I have not tested this very thoroughly so take it with
> a grain of salt.
Dangit! You beat me to it! I wrote this just last night, and was about
to make the manpage.
sbase-add-comm.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi all,
Implemented comm(1). I have not tested this very thoroughly so take it
with a grain of salt.
Thanks,
stateless
0001-Add-comm.patch
Description: Binary data
21 matches
Mail list logo
