On 22 May 2013 10:51, G David Modica wrote:
> On 20:21 Tue 21 May , Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > G David Modica writes:
> > > On 19:01 Tue 21 May , Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > > > Would be helpful to specify what program generates your manpages.
> Manuals l
> > > ook
> > > > fine here
On 20:21 Tue 21 May , Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> G David Modica writes:
> > On 19:01 Tue 21 May , Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > > Would be helpful to specify what program generates your manpages. Manuals
> > > l
> > ook
> > > fine here with st tip and mandoc...
> > >
> >
> > No idea how
G David Modica writes:
> On 19:01 Tue 21 May , Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > Would be helpful to specify what program generates your manpages. Manuals l
> ook
> > fine here with st tip and mandoc...
> >
>
> No idea how man pages are generated. I am running Archlinux. Any idea how I
> can te
On 19:01 Tue 21 May , Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Would be helpful to specify what program generates your manpages. Manuals look
> fine here with st tip and mandoc...
>
No idea how man pages are generated. I am running Archlinux. Any idea how I
can tell how they are generated?
David
G David Modica writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that man pages are not rendered properly under st-0.4.1 tip.
> For example in "man st" the SYNOPSYS line shows as:
>st [-a] [-c ] [-f ] [-g ] [-o ] [-t ] [-w
> ] [-v] [-e...]
>
> st-0.3 shows th
Hi,
I just noticed that man pages are not rendered properly under st-0.4.1 tip.
For example in "man st" the SYNOPSYS line shows as:
st [-a] [-c ] [-f ] [-g ] [-o ] [-t ] [-w
] [-v] [-e...]
st-0.3 shows the line as:
st [-a] [-c class]
Greetings comrades,
the surf repository now has a new common way to handle to enable or dis‐
able features. The only direct change of the meaning is ‐k, which now
disables kiosk mode.
Upper case: enable feature
Lower case: disable feature
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
On 05/21/2013 05:22 PM, Fernando C.V. wrote:
Also instead of slim you can just add "[[ $TTY == "/dev/tty1" ]] &&
exec xinit" to your bashrc and get rid of the display manager
completely.
Wouldn't that be .profile?
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Martin Miller wrote:
> I guess this system is a combo of Gnome and KDE.
> I spent a little time unsuccessfully configuring gdm from the settings
> panel.
If you have the choice, I would recommend getting something like
"slim" and just tweak your xinitrc to your l
