> Since a long‐time goal of suckless is to have its own better libc, is
> this a selection which is done to find the best functions. Strsep seems
> to be superior to strtok[_r], so I’m using it now.
Ok, I only hope that users of systems without strsep (for example solaris
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Greetings.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:40:56 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:47:57AM +0400, Alexander Sedov wrote:
> >It still conforms to C89/C99, which is the chosen standard for compiling
> >st according to default config.mk.
>
>
> Taken from C99 s
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:47:57AM +0400, Alexander Sedov wrote:
>It still conforms to C89/C99, which is the chosen standard for compiling
>st according to default config.mk.
Taken from C99 standard:
The strsep function was proposed as an enhanced replacement of strtok
functi
It still conforms to C89/C99, which is the chosen standard for compiling st
according to default config.mk.
Also, good thing about separate patches is that you don't need to apply all
of them. It looks like zero field handling was already casted upon
strtok_r, although in slightly more complicated
> 1. Replaced strtok_r with strsep in strparse, because strsep can handle
> zero-width fields (manpage says so) and because resulting code is
> clearer.
As far as I know strsep is a BSD extension and it is not a POSIX function,
so I think we should look for other solution.
Best re
Same things, with style error fixed.
2013/2/27 Alexander Sedov
> 1. Replaced strtok_r with strsep in strparse, because strsep can handle
> zero-width fields (manpage says so) and because resulting code is clearer.
> 2. Fixed potential problem with calling strtol on non-null-terminated
> buffer.
I do believe the goal of this project is not writing rxvt clone, or
"replacement", as you call it.
Also, your description of a problem is twisted and seems to touch feh, not
st.
If urxvt works for you, use urxvt, it's a decent terminal emulator.
2013/2/26 Andreas Marschall
> Good evening,
>
> I
1. Replaced strtok_r with strsep in strparse, because strsep can handle
zero-width fields (manpage says so) and because resulting code is clearer.
2. Fixed potential problem with calling strtol on non-null-terminated
buffer.
0001-Replaced-strtok_r-with-strsep-for-correct-empty-fiel.patch
Descript
Greetings.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:02:25 +0100 Andreas Marschall
wrote:
> [... brabbling about strange software used in a strange way ...]
>
> needless to say that urxvt on the other hand handles these tasks just
> fine, so at this point unfortunately st is not a full replacement for
> urxvt,
Good evening,
I just tested the latest git version of st with feh, which is my image
viewer of choice, and ranger, which I sometimes use as file manager. st
behaves like this;
when I open a folder of images in a simple st session and type: feh *.JPG
to see all images in that folder it opens
Greetings.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:56:05 +0100 Carlos Torres wrote:
> by the way from his backtrace it looks like he's on this commit
>
> http://git.suckless.org/st/tree/st.c?id=7cb0d95509d1b2837e4fa7d131f497800b20d22c#n3033
>
> and then
> http://git.suckless.org/st/tree/st.c?id=7cb0d95509d1b28
Greetings.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:10:00 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> So it is more logical that pasting send '\r' instead of '\n', but it is a
> better place in selcopy
>
> 800 if(is_selected && y < sel.e.y)
> 801
by the way from his backtrace it looks like he's on this commit
http://git.suckless.org/st/tree/st.c?id=7cb0d95509d1b2837e4fa7d131f497800b20d22c#n3033
and then
http://git.suckless.org/st/tree/st.c?id=7cb0d95509d1b2837e4fa7d131f497800b20d22c#n2810
causes leads to segfault
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 01:00:03PM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
> if he provides a core file? [..]
Recap then.
st.stderr: http://sprunge.us/eZDA
st.stdout: http://sprunge.us/cZbe
st.core: http://www.cyber-cypher.com/suckless/st.core
Files are from the same session.
Thanks.
--
--
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Anyone knows how to debug an OpenBSD i386 core on Linux x86_64?
if he provides a core file? which i think is ELF, and provided you
have the right versions of X11 libs installed which judging from the
first post are quit
Greetings.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:44:59 +0100 haris wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:38:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:38:18 +0100 haris wrote:
> > > Hi @ all. First mail in this list and I'd like to thank the dev team for
> > > all those q
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:27:14 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
> wrote:
> > So it is more logical that pasting send '\r' instead of '\n', but it is a
> > better place in selcopy
> >
> > 800 if(is_selected && y < sel.e.y)
> > 801
ok, so maybe stderr wasn't useful but someone might find stdout useful.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:39 PM, haris wrote:
> Done.
> st.stderr: http://sprunge.us/eZDA
> st.stdout: http://sprunge.us/cZbe
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:21:43AM -0500, Carlos Torres wrote:
> make that st -o - -e "vim" 1>st.stdout 2>st.stderr
>
Done.
st.stderr: http://sprunge.us/eZDA
st.stdout: http://sprunge.us/cZbe
--
---
something something
pgpKslEWErhnb.pgp
Description:
Greetings.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:27:14 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> So it is more logical that pasting send '\r' instead of '\n', but it is a
> better place in selcopy
>
> 800 if(is_selected && y < sel.e.y)
> 801
make that st -o - -e "vim" 1>st.stdout 2>st.stderr
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> you could try running st -e "vim" -o - 1>st.stdout 2>st.stderr
> or something similar.
>
> and paste that somewhere like sprunge
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:15 AM, haris wrote:
>> ... If
you could try running st -e "vim" -o - 1>st.stdout 2>st.stderr
or something similar.
and paste that somewhere like sprunge
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:15 AM, haris wrote:
> ... If you
> need any further info or testing, I'm here (maybe not the kind of help
> you need, as I do not have the knowledg
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:38:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:38:18 +0100 haris wrote:
> > Hi @ all. First mail in this list and I'd like to thank the dev team for
> > all those quality suckless solutions. :)
> >
> > I'm having the following problem w
On 11/02/13 at 06:38am, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> I can't reproduce the bug, so you have to do the debugging. I'm sorry.
>
> Please report back.
Greetings!
It seems that something is wrong with my webkitgtk build, because web inspector
ain't
work not only in surf, but in the other webkit-based
24 matches
Mail list logo
