a, did safari crash again?
On 29/09/2012, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites that
> waste most resources?
"meh"
resources * expected_users => waste of energy
Thus you should also take into account how often a site is actually
viewed by users.
Best would be making browsers show a "this page is going to drawn your
battery soon" hints ..
Marc Weber
On 09-29 23:18, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites
that waste most resources?
Indexing the parts of the web that don't suck is less work.
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg!
--
mrpantou...@upyum.com wrote:
What do you mean by « all the plug-ing » ? Only Flash or would you like to
include Silverlight, VLC… ?
All the plugins the page requests, presumably.
> waste most resources? An easy measurement would be running surf and all
> the plugins in its own group and then measure that memory, cpu, wakup
> and power usage vs. plain surf. Maybe adding some javascript to do some
> »average usage« would be nice too.
What do you mean by « all the plug-i
Greetings comrades.
What would you think about some kind of hall of shame for websites that
waste most resources? An easy measurement would be running surf and all
the plugins in its own group and then measure that memory, cpu, wakup
and power usage vs. plain surf. Maybe adding some javascrip
gimp sucks, I use photoshop.
I tried Liberation Mono, it didn't help, also, my statement that the
problem doesn't happen with Nano is wrong, I tried and same thing happened.
I'm pretty sure it is something with xtf but to be sure I will try with
"normal" fonts too.
Thanks, klr.
On 29 September 2012 09:26, Christoph Lohmann <
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 01:05:47AM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>I really tried to find corefonts that would look good and represent nearly
>all unicode characters - it's impossible.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 09:26:48AM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Near to all default xft fonts are missing a
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> If anyone here is more knowledgable in Xft programming and know how to
> get Xft to load a range of fonts and then automatically select a fitting
> glyph for a certain symbol, please let me know.
>
I'm not sure if that
Greetings comrades.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:26:48 +0200 KarlOskar Rikås wrote:
> Okey, I am using the Github repo, I'll check tomorrow try with other fonts,
> and other editors and programs.
>
> Note: same thing happens with DejaVu font too, also Nano seem to work fine
> but alsamixer does same m
12 matches
Mail list logo
