Re: [dev] [surf] make error

2012-01-04 Thread Patrick Haller
On 2012-01-04 21:28, Hannes Blut wrote: > When making surf on my setup i get do what the error says, add it to your libs in your config.mk, like: LIBS = -L/usr/lib -lc -lX11 -ljavascriptcoregtk-1.0 ${GTKLIB} -lgthread-2.0

Re: [dev] [surf] make error

2012-01-04 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:28:20 -, Hannes Blut wrote: In file included from /usr/include/webkit-1.0/JavaScriptCore/JavaScriptCore.h:30:0, from surf.c:20: /usr/include/webkit-1.0/JavaScriptCore/JSStringRefCF.h:30:43: fatal error: CoreFoundation/CoreFoundation.h: No such file or

[dev] [surf] make error

2012-01-04 Thread Hannes Blut
When making surf on my setup i get sh-4.2$ make surf build options: CFLAGS   = -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Os -I. -I/usr/include -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/includ

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2012-01-04 Thread Justin Pogue
Obligatory: http://xkcd.com/445/ On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Seth Hover wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Stefan Mark wrote: >> > This statement has some nice boomerang Irony. >> >> pretty amazing that you don't unde

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2012-01-04 Thread Seth Hover
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Stefan Mark wrote: > > This statement has some nice boomerang Irony. > > pretty amazing that you don't understand boomerangs OR irony > > i bought a boomerang once, and it didn't come back when i threw

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2012-01-04 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:05:09PM +0100, Stefan Mark wrote: > This statement has some nice boomerang Irony. pretty amazing that you don't understand boomerangs OR irony

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2012-01-04 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 29 December 2011 05:55, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: > monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC > while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle. > > It's very popular[2] these days on the Arch Linux forums; try it out! :) > > [1]: https://bbs.

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2012-01-04 Thread Stefan Mark
On 30.12.2011 21:35, Kurt H Maier wrote: > I love arch linux's facility for coralling all the nitwits into one > self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks > out into the real world. > This statement has some nice boomerang Irony.