Here you go...
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:43:59PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> thanks for your patch. I would like to test it.
>
> Can you resend it as attachment that is created using
>
> cd dwm/
> hg diff > dwm_two_monitor_fix.patch
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Anselm
>
> On 2 N
> I just want to be fair to the small crowd of remaining wmii users to
> have a smooth relocation. Everything will be accomplished until mid of
> December.
Thanks. Not many of us depend on the web site anyway, but new users
should have the freedom to find it.
Quoth Peter John Hartman:
> One thing that *rumor* has it surf can't handle are fancy-schmancy
> downloads, for instance, I'm told RapidShare fails[1].
More testing has shown that this is actually a lie (sorry about
that). I have definitely seen failures in the past with downloading,
but would r
On 4 November 2011 12:24, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Anselm is scared to piss of the "community" so he needs everyone to
> agree with his rules and ideas beforehand. Typical social behaviorism
> I guess.
I just want to be fair to the small crowd of remaining wmii users to
have a smooth
On 4 November 2011 11:50, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 4 November 2011 09:40, markus schnalke wrote:
>> Someone already pointed it out. It actually were suckless projects
>> that did intentionally not care about the meaning of version numbers.
>
> I agree. I don't even see why we don't just drop
On 4 November 2011 10:40, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2011-10-31 10:11] Anselm R Garbe
>> On 31 October 2011 10:01, Martin Kopta wrote:
>> > Are there any explicit rules which project must follow in order to be part
>> > of suckless? What is the line in here?
>>
>> I'm working on such guidelines.
Hi Brian,
thanks for your patch. I would like to test it.
Can you resend it as attachment that is created using
cd dwm/
hg diff > dwm_two_monitor_fix.patch
Thanks in advance,
Anselm
On 2 November 2011 22:19, Brian L Angus wrote:
> Hello and thanks for the wonder that is dwm.
>
> Below is a pa
On 2011-11-03 16:30, Peter John Hartman wrote:
>
> Second of all, and instead, it just prints to stdout (a) the fact that the
> Download has started, together with the filename, and (b) the fact that it
> has finished/cancelled/errored, together with the filename.
Not much more to add a progress b
Anselm is scared to piss of the "community" so he needs everyone to
agree with his rules and ideas beforehand. Typical social behaviorism
I guess.
+--- markus schnalke ---+
> I wonder why we actually do need such guidelines. We don't have masses
> of projects to filter. We can simply continue including what we (i.e.
> eventually Anselm) consider worthwhile and remove what we consider not
> suiti
On 4 November 2011 09:40, markus schnalke wrote:
> Someone already pointed it out. It actually were suckless projects
> that did intentionally not care about the meaning of version numbers.
I agree. I don't even see why we don't just drop the first dot and
have dwm-60, dmenu-45.
> And about qual
[2011-10-31 10:11] Anselm R Garbe
> On 31 October 2011 10:01, Martin Kopta wrote:
> > Are there any explicit rules which project must follow in order to be part
> > of suckless? What is the line in here?
>
> I'm working on such guidelines. The main aspects are:
I wonder why we actually do need
On 11/3/11, Andrew Hills wrote:
> Nothing you do to a web standard will ever keep a designer from using an
> image to display text content except disallowing the transfer of images.
>
However poetic your statement, disabling embedding of images will
suffice. was probably the first great anti-feat
13 matches
Mail list logo
