[dev] Re: suckless.org freeze

2011-09-28 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi there, suckless.org is back online now. Best regards, Anselm On 28 September 2011 23:33, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Hi there, > > please do not perform any list posts, commits or do not wonder when > suckless.org is down for a couple of hours. > > I'm currently moving it to the new host. I expe

[dev] suckless.org freeze

2011-09-28 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi there, please do not perform any list posts, commits or do not wonder when suckless.org is down for a couple of hours. I'm currently moving it to the new host. I expect this being finished in a couple of hours. Best regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] [surf] download patch updated

2011-09-28 Thread Patrick Haller
On 2011-09-28 14:51, Nick wrote: > Quoth Troels Henriksen: > > Nick writes: > > Huh? I have not had trouble using wget for this. > Can anyone else confirm / deny this? Not for those sites, however I did see enough fails to add the same to https://github.com/patrickhaller/surf-ph Patrick

Re: [dev] [surf] download patch updated

2011-09-28 Thread Troels Henriksen
Nick writes: > In other surf news, I created a page on the wiki > http://surf.suckless.org/failing_sites - if anyone finds something > that doesn't work in surf, please detail it there (or on the mailing > list). While surf is very far from perfect, it's the most reasonable > way of using toda

Re: [dev] [surf] download patch updated

2011-09-28 Thread Troels Henriksen
Nick writes: > Quoth Troels Henriksen: >> Nick writes: >> >> > Howdy, >> > >> > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in >> > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather >> > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it >>

Re: [dev] [surf] download patch updated

2011-09-28 Thread Nick
Quoth Troels Henriksen: > Nick writes: > > > Howdy, > > > > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in > > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather > > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it > > isn't, as it's needed f

Re: [dev] [surf] download patch updated

2011-09-28 Thread Troels Henriksen
Nick writes: > Howdy, > > I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in > July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather > than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it > isn't, as it's needed for horrible javascript sorts of download

[dev] [surf] download patch updated

2011-09-28 Thread Nick
Howdy, I recently got around to updating the patch posted to the list in July last year by Carlos, which builds downloading into surf rather than relying on e.g. wget. While this sounds like a bad idea, it isn't, as it's needed for horrible javascript sorts of downloads, such as from rapidshar