Hi Fernan,
I finally went with a virtual arch linux install. But in the meantime
I'm back on real PC hardware again :)
Cheers,
Anselm
On 6 June 2011 04:27, Fernan Bolando wrote:
> Anselm
>
> I am curious at what you finally decided to do with your mac os x
> dilema. Going through the thread did
Anselm
I am curious at what you finally decided to do with your mac os x
dilema. Going through the thread didn't seem like a final decision was
made.
fernan
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> at work I have to use OSX (on a MacBook Pro 13") for various reason
On 6/5/11, ilf wrote:
> On 06-05 19:08, hiro wrote:
>> The "best" "smart" phones maintain 24/7 connections to icq, msn,
>> yahoo, irc, google mail, exchange, facebook, twitter and regularly
>> download all subscribed rss feeds and podcasts to always keep you "up
>> to date".
>
> I actually only wa
I'd get a palm pre for about EUR 100.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 19:18, ilf wrote:
> On 06-05 19:08, hiro wrote:
>>
>> The "best" "smart" phones maintain 24/7 connections to icq, msn, yahoo,
>> irc, google mail, exchange, facebook, twitter and regularly download all
>> subscribed rss feeds and podcas
On 06-05 19:08, hiro wrote:
The "best" "smart" phones maintain 24/7 connections to icq, msn,
yahoo, irc, google mail, exchange, facebook, twitter and regularly
download all subscribed rss feeds and podcasts to always keep you "up
to date".
I actually only want a Browser and a usable Terminal
The "best" "smart" phones maintain 24/7 connections to icq, msn,
yahoo, irc, google mail, exchange, facebook, twitter and regularly
download all subscribed rss feeds and podcasts to always keep you "up
to date".
An ARM can be quite efficient, but as you might guess it doesn't
*generate* power.
And
I concur, smartphones are supposed to suck, it tries to do everything at
once, it's by design.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Džen wrote:
> On 05/06/2011 16:31, ilf wrote:
>
>> Apparently all smartphones suck. Hard.
>>
>
> True on that. Personally I don't really see a reason at all to use a
>
On 05/06/2011 16:31, ilf wrote:
Apparently all smartphones suck. Hard.
True on that. Personally I don't really see a reason at all to use a
smartphone. Smartphones simply overcomplicate everything. IMO the
suck-less way would be to not use smartphones, just as I do.
--
Džen
I think you sumarized the situation pretty well: All smartphone suck.
Even though they switched to windows mobile, Nokia is supposed to
release a MeeGo compatible device this year (called n950/n9 whatever).
For me it's wait and see.
--
Christophe-Marie Duquesne
No, you just got trolled.
On Jun 5, 2011 8:49 AM, "Pierre Chapuis" wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:01:54 +0100, garbeam wrote:
>> On 3 June 2011 12:41, Sir Cyrus wrote:
>>> What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
>>
>> http://bellard.org/jslinux/
>
> So the most suckless Linux is a Linux that
Apparently all smartphones suck. Hard.
One can either choose the Apple walled garden or the Google walled
garden.
The Nokia N900 may feel more familiar with MeeGo being a "real" Linux,
but it seems kind of dead since Nokia announced its switch to Windows
Mobile Phone.
The Openmoko FreeRunn
On 6/5/11, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:01:54 +0100, garbeam wrote:
>> http://bellard.org/jslinux/
>
> So the most suckless Linux is a Linux that requires a
> bloated Javascript VM to run?
>
The distro doesn't - the i386 emulator does.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:01:54 +0100, garbeam wrote:
On 3 June 2011 12:41, Sir Cyrus wrote:
What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
http://bellard.org/jslinux/
So the most suckless Linux is a Linux that requires a
bloated Javascript VM to run?
--
catwell
13 matches
Mail list logo
