[surf] Downloading files (was: Re: [dev] st -e not working?)

2011-05-12 Thread Jonathan Slark
On 12/05/2011 23:39, Connor Lane Smith wrote: On 12 May 2011 23:34, Sir Cyrus wrote: However I'm still having trouble downloading files in surf. I've tried recompiling using "st" in place of "xterm" in config.def.h, as well as creating a symbolic link from xterm to st, but neither seem to work.

Re: [dev] st -e not working?

2011-05-12 Thread Sir Cyrus
Just tried that. My config.h: http://pastebin.com/fgK61dub As a sidenote pwmt's jumanji browser handles downloading fine, so it doesn't seem to be a st/wget issue.

Re: [dev] wmii - key events are not read unless they are repeated

2011-05-12 Thread Ben Smith
> the event handler code seemed to be pausing on the line: > > line = "$(echo $line | sed 's/^[^ ]* //' | tr -d '\n')" > > Simply commenting it out fixed the problem, what is this lines purpose? > The problem was with the whitespace on either side of the '=', I'm still not sure if this command is

Re: [dev] st -e not working?

2011-05-12 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 12 May 2011 23:34, Sir Cyrus wrote: > However I'm still having trouble downloading files in surf. I've tried > recompiling using "st" in place of "xterm" in config.def.h, as well as > creating a symbolic link from xterm to st, but neither seem to work. Line 17 in config.h should read: > "st -

Re: [dev] st -e not working?

2011-05-12 Thread Sir Cyrus
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Josh Rickmar wrote: >It runs the given command in place of your shell. As soon as it quits, so >does st. Run "st -e cat" to try with a program that doesn't terminate >immediatelly. Thought that might have been it, and those seem to work (huzzah!) However I'm s

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-12 Thread hiro
> Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits Well, that's one more point for dillo then...

Re: [dev] st -e not working?

2011-05-12 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 12 May 2011 23:11, Sir Cyrus wrote: > Using st 0.1.1 and the -e switch appears to not be working. It does work, but as soon as the command exits so does st. $ st -e python $ st -e wget example.net The former open st with a Python prompt; the latter downloads the URL and then exits. Th

Re: [dev] st -e not working?

2011-05-12 Thread Josh Rickmar
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:11:10PM +0100, Sir Cyrus wrote: > Using st 0.1.1 and the -e switch appears to not be working. As test cases I > ran > st -e ls > st -e "ls" > st -e echo hello > st -e "echo hello" > and a few others, but nothing seemed to work. Has this not been > implemented yet? Or am

[dev] st -e not working?

2011-05-12 Thread Sir Cyrus
Using st 0.1.1 and the -e switch appears to not be working. As test cases I ran st -e ls st -e "ls" st -e echo hello st -e "echo hello" and a few others, but nothing seemed to work. Has this not been implemented yet? Or am I doing something wrong? This makes it impossible to download files using su

Re: [dev] Suckless UML

2011-05-12 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Uriel [2011-05-12 19:54:26 +0200]: > Fortunately somebody already has done some writing on the topic: > > http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html > it is also worth noting that even original contributors of uml find it problematic http://port70.net/~nsz/arti

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-12 Thread Uriel
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Yoshi Rokuko wrote: > + hiro ---+ >> >> About dillo again: last time I talked about fltk everyone here wanted >> to kill me and I had to change my phone number. Is this just because >> of C++ or are there o

Re: [dev] Tabbed unmaintained?

2011-05-12 Thread Uriel
Fucking German fags, learn English, morons. uriel On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:15 PM, wrote: > evening' > > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:04:07PM +0200, ilf wrote: >> On 05-06 22:46, u...@netbeisser.de wrote: >> >1 Oettinger is on the way. > >> Oettinger? SRSLY? > > zes, different brands at the Linux

Re: [dev] Suckless UML

2011-05-12 Thread Uriel
So much retarded crap in this thread, it is hard to know where to start. Fortunately somebody already has done some writing on the topic: http://archive.eiffel.com/doc/manuals/technology/bmarticles/uml/page.html UML makes CORBA and C++ look like sane, productive and useful technologies by compar

Re: [dev] Suckless UML

2011-05-12 Thread Pierre Chapuis
On Thu, 12 May 2011 15:57:13 +0200, Nicolai Waniek wrote: On 05/12/2011 03:51 PM, Nicolai Waniek wrote: I still have to find any sane mathematical notation for parallelism in programming languages though... Of course CSP goes in this direction, but as soon as your language is not based on CSP

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-12 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 6 May 2011, at 3:50 pm, Kurt H Maier wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:47 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: Because it's linked in or because it doesn't use it? Because most of it is compiled statically and the bits that are not are shipped in the tarball and installed in-tree. A b

Re: [dev] Suckless UML

2011-05-12 Thread Nicolai Waniek
On 05/12/2011 03:51 PM, Nicolai Waniek wrote: > I still have to find any sane mathematical notation for parallelism in > programming languages though... Of course CSP goes in this direction, but as soon as your language is not based on CSP in any way, you yet again have to document describing the

Re: [dev] Suckless UML

2011-05-12 Thread Nicolai Waniek
> I am > saying if your code needs UML documentation to be understood, then it > is not suckless. I fully agree. > Also, I tend to dislike auto-generated documentation because the > valuable part is very small and hidden among loads of crap. That depends on the tool you (have to) use. As an ex

Re: [dev] [PATCH] dmenu: Add commandline-options to determine Xinerama-screen

2011-05-12 Thread Rob
On 11 May 2011 12:39, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > Hey Rob, > > I think this was caused by the given '-m' not being present. I've > applied a patch which should fix this, since it falls back to the > mouse if the '-m' isn't there. Could you confirm whether it works? > > If it doesn't it's a weird co