Does it really matter whether it's ideal or not? Ideal is such a
relative term after all. Some people might find it ideal, some not. I
think it's an interesting hack, but (no offence to Patrick of course)
not ideal for me. However, I still am in full support of the continued
development of this
> Rob,
>
> Without a real context it is difficult to measure if lack-of-configuration
> is laziness on the programmers part, or the genius of simplicity. Simplicity
> indicates a programmer who anticipate the needs of the user in such a way
> that it removes their constraints and increases performa
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:03 PM, wrote:
> sed 's/.*/#&$&@/' /var/log/messages > /dev/audio
>
> somewhat boring ;)
This might be the world's most accurate Wagner emulator.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:33:25PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:48 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Do you want to tell me that sed, awk and cat is "ideal software"?
> >
> > sed is not ideal software for listening to music, is it?
>
> Are you recommending itune
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:48 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Do you want to tell me that sed, awk and cat is "ideal software"?
>
> sed is not ideal software for listening to music, is it?
Are you recommending itunes as a window manager?
--
# Kurt H Maier
It (might be) ideal software for text modification and regex.
Ideal software doesn't do everything. In fact, it is often suboptimal
software that does everything.
On 2 March 2011 12:48, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Do you want to tell me that sed, awk and cat is "ideal software"?
>
> sed
Do you want to tell me that sed, awk and cat is "ideal software"?
sed is not ideal software for listening to music, is it?
On 3/2/11, Rob wrote:
> On 2 March 2011 15:11, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/2/11, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>>> I'm saying that ideal software is barely configur
Rob,
Without a real context it is difficult to measure if lack-of-configuration
is laziness on the programmers part, or the genius of simplicity. Simplicity
indicates a programmer who anticipate the needs of the user in such a way
that it removes their constraints and increases performance to achi
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:00:12AM +0300, Roman Belov wrote:
> Sorry for misinformation. It was wrong stack trace. This call does not
> correspond the target malloc(48) without free(). I will update this
> thread a bit later.
>
I confused a various versions of wmii/libixp. Actually, problem was
f
I am unfortunately on a Windows machine right now (at work) but if I
understand you correctly, this is by design.
alt+j/k moves the focus. Think about what happens when you hit
alt+j/k in tile mode to set the focus on a window in the stack. If
you then launch a new window, the new window becomes
On 2 March 2011 15:11, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 3/2/11, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> I'm saying that ideal software is barely configurable.
>
> Ideal for what purpose?
> "Barely" anything doesn't carry information if you put it in context
> with "ideal".
> You should have said: Ideal s
On 3/2/11, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I'm saying that ideal software is barely configurable.
Ideal for what purpose?
"Barely" anything doesn't carry information if you put it in context
with "ideal".
You should have said: Ideal software doesn't suck.
Yes, I use this machine every day for playing music with mpd and light
browsing like gmail with dillo. It is fanless and runs from a DOM. You
naturally avoid flash & java scripts, but most sites in the internet
are a waste of time anyway.
I really like my current setup, but I will probably get a k
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:59:11PM +, hiro wrote:
> So you say wmii is bad because it's less work to fiddle around with?
I'm saying that ideal software is barely configurable.
> I use it because I like the default configuration better than dwm's.
> I run it on old celerons and 64mb ram. Speed
Patrick, sqweek's comment was ironic!
On 3/2/11, sqweek wrote:
> On 27 February 2011 01:01, Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws> wrote:
>> yup. WMs usually bind several orthogonals: window manipulation /
>> decoration, keyboard shortcuts. focus management.
>
> Nice. Each task is so simple
So you say wmii is bad because it's less work to fiddle around with?
I use it because I like the default configuration better than dwm's.
I run it on old celerons and 64mb ram. Speed is not an issue.
--- Begin Message ---
I found that in monocle layout there is some confusing behaviour of dwm:
In tiled layout the previous opened window is always under the freshly
opened one (hit alt+shift+enter to get new terminal window and then
your previously focused window is under
+1
On 03/02/11 10:58, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:48:43PM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
If you understand some of the C functions of dwm as Unix processes
than you are pretty close to realise, one can play thin
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:48:43PM +0800, Patrick Haller wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >
> > If you understand some of the C functions of dwm as Unix processes
> > than you are pretty close to realise, one can play things pretty much
> > Unix like, but i
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
> If you understand some of the C functions of dwm as Unix processes
> than you are pretty close to realise, one can play things pretty much
> Unix like, but if the LOC adds up dramatically at the bottom line, it
> is probably not wo
Hi Mark,
many thanks for investigating this annoying issue. You traced it
further than I did the last time when I concluded xrandr -s does
something bitchy. I will look through your proposed patches on Friday
and apply the portions that make most sense. I need to understand the
problem while debug
On 2 March 2011 04:36, sqweek wrote:
> On 27 February 2011 01:01, Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws> wrote:
>> yup. WMs usually bind several orthogonals: window manipulation /
>> decoration, keyboard shortcuts. focus management.
>
> Nice. Each task is so simple broken down like this :)
A
22 matches
Mail list logo
