Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread Jacob Todd
Dietlibc is the first thing that came off the top of my head, I have no idea how well it is or if it's maintained. There's no reason not to use uclibc.

Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread Moritz Wilhelmy
Excerpts from Jacob Todd's message of Fri Oct 08 01:24:55 +0200 2010: > Glibc has been like that for a while. Use dietlibc if you want to actually > link statically. I heard from different sources that dietlibc sucks and is not very well-maintained (not sure if those rumours are true though) Why n

Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread Jacob Todd
Glibc has been like that for a while. Use dietlibc if you want to actually link statically.

Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-07 Thread matus,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 05:44:50PM +0100, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > > On 7 Oct 2010, at 1:44 am, Wolf Tivy wrote: > > >Ok, I'm not sure I understand you on this one. What you are talking > >about (killing apps) is not affected by my patch. If you mean that we > >should filter repeats globally

Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread Uriel
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:22 PM, pancake wrote: > Thats not new. 9base build isbroken in arch for about a while. Last glibc is > stupid You say it as if the previous glibc's were not stupid, they just somehow managed to make the latest glibc even *more* stupid than it was already, i'm sure they

Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread pancake
Thats not new. 9base build isbroken in arch for about a while. Last glibc is stupid On 07/10/2010, at 21:52, "John A. Grahor" wrote: > Here's just another example of the evils of glibc. > > I was linking an executable statically on Red Hat Enterprise 5.5 and got this > message: > > warning:

[dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread John A. Grahor
Here's just another example of the evils of glibc. I was linking an executable statically on Red Hat Enterprise 5.5 and got this message: warning: Using 'gethostbyname' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking They've

Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-07 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 7 Oct 2010, at 1:44 am, Wolf Tivy wrote: Ok, I'm not sure I understand you on this one. What you are talking about (killing apps) is not affected by my patch. If you mean that we should filter repeats globally in dwm, not just in this case, then I don't think it should be done. That fe

Re: [dev] debugging wmii

2010-10-07 Thread Vladimir Levin
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Vladimir Levin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm running the latest hg of wmii, and it seems that once in a while it's >> causing X to crash on me (mostly during resizing in the floating layer). >> This also

Re: [dev] [dwm] tagging interface

2010-10-07 Thread Rob
On 7 October 2010 01:44, Wolf Tivy wrote: >... > > Aside, has anyone tried out the combo patch? I am finding it pretty useful. Yeah, I just wasn't so keen on having to hold down each number when selecting tags, so I tried to alter it so you could do something like so: KeyDown: Modkey KeyPress: 1

Re: [dev] debugging wmii

2010-10-07 Thread Kris Maglione
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Vladimir Levin wrote: Hi, I'm running the latest hg of wmii, and it seems that once in a while it's causing X to crash on me (mostly during resizing in the floating layer). This also happened to me when I was using the latest stable release. The question

[dev] debugging wmii

2010-10-07 Thread Vladimir Levin
Hi, I'm running the latest hg of wmii, and it seems that once in a while it's causing X to crash on me (mostly during resizing in the floating layer). This also happened to me when I was using the latest stable release. The question I have is how would I go about debugging this problem (since it m