Re: [dev] wrap: minimalist archiving tool

2010-08-08 Thread David Tweed
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > I've written a tiny archiver, which I've called "wrap" for lack of a > better name. It is 120 lines of C, and yields far smaller archives > than tar while overcoming the various crippling limitations of ar. It > does, however, only store f

Re: [dev] wrap: minimalist archiving tool

2010-08-08 Thread Anders Andersson
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Connor Lane Smith [2010-08-06 15:10:29 +0100]: > >> I've written a tiny archiver, which I've called "wrap" for lack of a > > looks nice (nicer than tar, cpio or gnu ar) > >> I'm not quite sure of the use case for this, but I don't know, som

Re: [dev] wrap: minimalist archiving tool

2010-08-08 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Connor Lane Smith [2010-08-06 15:10:29 +0100]: > I've written a tiny archiver, which I've called "wrap" for lack of a looks nice (nicer than tar, cpio or gnu ar) > I'm not quite sure of the use case for this, but I don't know, someone i'm not sure either but it'd be unixy to do find dir | x

[dev] [wmii] Wmii breaks block selection in kicad

2010-08-08 Thread Daniel
Hi, I use wmii excusively as my WM, but I encountered strange problem: block selection (left mouse click+drag) does not work in kicad under wnii. kicad is EDA software: http://iut-tice.ujf-grenoble.fr/kicad/ Im using version BZR R2356 (stable, 5.05.2010) with libmspack 0.2alpha and wxWidgets 2.8

Re: [dev] wrap: minimalist archiving tool

2010-08-08 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
* Connor Lane Smith [2010-08-06 15:10:29 +0100]: > Interestingly during testing the best compression results came from > our very own sflate. there was a bug in the encoder, it could corrupt your data (i noticed it after rewriting a few things, but forgot to backport the fix to the repo on suck

Re: [dev] [patch] xmms like pattern matching for dmenu (update to hg tip)

2010-08-08 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 22:27:31 +0100 StephenB wrote: > On 7 August 2010 20:36, Robert Ransom wrote: > > > On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 17:23:13 +0100 > > StephenB wrote: > > > > > Just to make clear, this patch is an updated version of the one > > > here: > > > http://tools.suckless.org/dmenu/patches/xmms-

Re: [dev] [patch] add Control-G and Control-D to dmenu

2010-08-08 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Uriel wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote: This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to d

Re: [dev] [dwm] spawn a floating window

2010-08-08 Thread Sean Whitton
Hi, On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:01:47PM +0200, Pascal Wittmann wrote: > I tried to write a function that spawns a window/client and makes it > floating, but with no success. I looked a the spawn function, but I > have no idea how to get/alter the isfloating value of the new client. > Simply taking

Re: [dev] [patch] add Control-G and Control-D to dmenu

2010-08-08 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Uriel wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: Hey, On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote: This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are also used in programs like bash or Emacs. I've added C-d but

Re: [dev] [dwm] adding WM_WINDOW_ROLE rule

2010-08-08 Thread Kris Maglione
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:36:24AM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: It's so sad to see that suckless developers don't want to add 10 lines to the code to improve it just because *the developers* think it's useless. Maybe for people it's useless, but for others it can be useful. Sad. Don't get piss

Re: [dev] [patch] add Control-G and Control-D to dmenu

2010-08-08 Thread Uriel
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > Hey, > > On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote: >> This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are >> also used in programs like bash or Emacs. > > I've added C-d but not C-g, since it seems like an emacsism. Bot

Re: [dev] [dwm] adding WM_WINDOW_ROLE rule

2010-08-08 Thread Martin Kopta
Refuse to add code is sad but allright. Refuse to remove code would be real problem. Dne 8.8.2010 9:36 "David DEMELIER" napsal/a: 2010/7/27 Anselm R Garbe : > Hi David, > > On 26 July 2010 22:32, David DEMELIER wrote: >> There is ... It's so sad to see that suckless developers don't want to ad

Re: [dev] [dwm] adding WM_WINDOW_ROLE rule

2010-08-08 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/7/27 Anselm R Garbe : > Hi David, > > On 26 July 2010 22:32, David DEMELIER wrote: >> There is something that make me sad with dwm, there is a lack of role >> rules for clients. I explain : clients have instance and name using >> WM_CLASS, but there is also WM_WINDOW_ROLE which is really impo