This changeset is not released, but it introduced a bug and it have not
fixed for a month.
The problem is that when you call `focus(lastsel)` from `unmanage`
there is a possibility that lastsel is NULL. In this case `focus` first
first checks `if (!c)` on line 390 and sets `c` to `sel` (line 391).
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Antle wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
>> anonymous dixit (2010-01-20, 10:57):
>>
>> > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not
>> > > using exec in xinitrc/xsession!
>> > >
>> > Pro
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> anonymous dixit (2010-01-20, 10:57):
>
> > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not
> > > using exec in xinitrc/xsession!
> > >
> > Problem here is (not (using exec startx or startx & exit)), not
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:13:49PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:11:03PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> > Maybe it is ok too, but I haven't tried it. I suggest Slackware because
> > I think that it is what OP asked for: you can build software by hand,
> > make package and in
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:11:03PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> Maybe it is ok too, but I haven't tried it. I suggest Slackware because
> I think that it is what OP asked for: you can build software by hand,
> make package and install with a package manager. You don't have
> to write building script i
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:46:55PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:56:56PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> > Why not Slackware?
> >
>
> Why not suse?
>
Maybe it is ok too, but I haven't tried it. I suggest Slackware because
I think that it is what OP asked for: you can buil
On (20/01/10 10:57), anonymous wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:57:41 +0300
> From: anonymous
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe
> List-Id: dev mail list
>
> > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not
> > using exec in xinitrc/xsession
anonymous dixit (2010-01-20, 10:57):
> > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not
> > using exec in xinitrc/xsession!
> >
> Problem here is (not (using exec startx or startx & exit)), not (using
> or not using exec in xinitrc/xsession).
I also parsed it that way,
> Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not
> using exec in xinitrc/xsession!
>
Problem here is (not (using exec startx or startx & exit)), not (using
or not using exec in xinitrc/xsession).
Right?
2010/1/20 Josh Rickmar
> OpenBSD is switching to pcc, or it appears very likely that it will
> sometime in the future.
>
> http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20091228231142
>
>
I love PPC!
--
MfG
Kai Heide
Es reitet der Heidereiter durch die Heide weiter
10 matches
Mail list logo