[dev] [tabbed] changeset 132 (last viewed tab remembering)

2010-01-20 Thread anonymous
This changeset is not released, but it introduced a bug and it have not fixed for a month. The problem is that when you call `focus(lastsel)` from `unmanage` there is a possibility that lastsel is NULL. In this case `focus` first first checks `if (!c)` on line 390 and sets `c` to `sel` (line 391).

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-20 Thread Andrew Antle
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Antle wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: >> anonymous dixit (2010-01-20, 10:57): >> >> > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not >> > > using exec in xinitrc/xsession! >> > > >> > Pro

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-20 Thread Andrew Antle
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > anonymous dixit (2010-01-20, 10:57): > > > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not > > > using exec in xinitrc/xsession! > > > > > Problem here is (not (using exec startx or startx & exit)), not

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-20 Thread anonymous
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:13:49PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:11:03PM +0300, anonymous wrote: > > Maybe it is ok too, but I haven't tried it. I suggest Slackware because > > I think that it is what OP asked for: you can build software by hand, > > make package and in

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-20 Thread Moritz Wilhelmy
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:11:03PM +0300, anonymous wrote: > Maybe it is ok too, but I haven't tried it. I suggest Slackware because > I think that it is what OP asked for: you can build software by hand, > make package and install with a package manager. You don't have > to write building script i

Re: [dev] [OT] Distribution

2010-01-20 Thread anonymous
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:46:55PM +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:56:56PM +0300, anonymous wrote: > > Why not Slackware? > > > > Why not suse? > Maybe it is ok too, but I haven't tried it. I suggest Slackware because I think that it is what OP asked for: you can buil

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-20 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (20/01/10 10:57), anonymous wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:57:41 +0300 > From: anonymous > To: dev mail list > Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe > List-Id: dev mail list > > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not > > using exec in xinitrc/xsession

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-20 Thread Antoni Grzymala
anonymous dixit (2010-01-20, 10:57): > > Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not > > using exec in xinitrc/xsession! > > > Problem here is (not (using exec startx or startx & exit)), not (using > or not using exec in xinitrc/xsession). I also parsed it that way,

Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe

2010-01-20 Thread anonymous
> Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not > using exec in xinitrc/xsession! > Problem here is (not (using exec startx or startx & exit)), not (using or not using exec in xinitrc/xsession). Right?

Re: [dev] Distribution

2010-01-20 Thread Kai Heide
2010/1/20 Josh Rickmar > OpenBSD is switching to pcc, or it appears very likely that it will > sometime in the future. > > http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20091228231142 > > I love PPC! -- MfG Kai Heide Es reitet der Heidereiter durch die Heide weiter