Fellow wmii users,
I'm pleased to announce the next evolution of my YAML-based Ruby wmiirc:
http://github.com/sunaku/wmiirc
The big idea, suggested by Nathan Neff, is that the config.yaml file
should be able to import other YAML files ("partials" as I call them).
This allows us to share and m
On 01/03/2010 01:11 AM, hiro wrote:
> Often it's better to listen to your intuition and ignore German laws.
> Especially if you are no lawyer and just read about so-called laws on
> Wikipedia.
most stupid idea ever. if you're in the software industry and wish to make your
source public you should
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:35:44AM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> Something from gcc manpage:
>
> "It makes a difference where in the command you write this option; the
> linker searches and processes libraries and object files in the order
> they are specified. Thus, foo.o -lz bar.o searches library
What does it matter that it runs on a vm?
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Andres P <97.56...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Like ^ said, it basically runs on a vm.
>
> And it was inspired by C++. Going more into how C++ sucks would sadly
> (gladly?) be OT.
>
>
> Some parts of the world (I think DE is one of them) don't recognize
> the phrase "public domain" to mean anything in particular, so you have
> to write what you mean it to say. Something like "This software is in
> the public domain. That means that you can ..."
Often it's better to listen to yo
Like ^ said, it basically runs on a vm.
And it was inspired by C++. Going more into how C++ sucks would sadly
(gladly?) be OT.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:37:18PM -0600, Nathan Neff wrote:
> Can anyone here at suckless summarize their dislike of Java?
>From my perspective, Java is a lot like computer science masturbation.
Rather than trust an electrical engineer to design a machine, they
invented their own. Now every prog
Something from gcc manpage:
"It makes a difference where in the command you write this option; the
linker searches and processes libraries and object files in the order
they are specified. Thus, foo.o -lz bar.o searches library z after
file foo.o but before bar.o. If bar.o refers to functions in
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:38:36PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> > --- makefile2010-01-02 18:56:40.0 +0100
> > +++ makefile.patched 2010-01-02 18:58:08.0 +0100
> > @@ -13 +13 @@
> > - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG)
> > + $(CC) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG) $(LDFLAGS)
>
>
> so I needed the following patch to compile it over here on my (lunar-)linux
> box.
>
> --- makefile 2010-01-02 18:56:40.0 +0100
> +++ makefile.patched 2010-01-02 18:58:08.0 +0100
> @@ -13 +13 @@
> - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG)
> + $(CC) $(OBJS) -o $(PROG) $(LDFLAG
ev'ning everyone,
i got some obscure behaviour of gcc/icc over here,
is there anyone able to tell my why this happens/works?
> v4hn 18:52:19 ~/repos/netscan $ gcc -lpthread -lpcap *.o -o portscan
network.o: In function `default_device':
network.c:(.text+0x5d5): undefined reference to `pcap_lookup
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0500, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, anonymous wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
> >> licenses are stupid
> >>
> >
> > I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
> > Will adding of "/* Pu
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 07:37:29PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
> > licenses are stupid
> >
>
> I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
> Will adding of "/* Public Domain */" into every source file be enough?
>
>
You m
> Here is a patch to let it build on OpenBSD:
>
> --- parse.c.origSat Jan 2 12:54:18 2010
> +++ parse.c Sat Jan 2 12:54:01 2010
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +#include
> +#include
> #include
>
> #include
> @@ -5,6 +7,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
> #include
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, anonymous wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
>> licenses are stupid
>>
>
> I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
> Will adding of "/* Public Domain */" into every source file be enough?
Some parts of the world
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
> licenses are stupid
>
I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
Will adding of "/* Public Domain */" into every source file be enough?
licenses are stupid
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Colin Didier wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:47:19AM +0300, anonymous wrote:
>> Ok, code is here: http://bitbucket.org/noname/netscan/
>
> Nice, but there is no license on the source code files.
>
> Here is a patch to let it build on OpenBS
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:47:19AM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> Ok, code is here: http://bitbucket.org/noname/netscan/
Nice, but there is no license on the source code files.
Here is a patch to let it build on OpenBSD:
--- parse.c.origSat Jan 2 12:54:18 2010
+++ parse.c Sat Jan 2 12:5
18 matches
Mail list logo
