On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:56:00AM -0400, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
> markus schnalke wrote:
>> [2009-10-15 21:47] sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
>>> Well, I can't tell which view is more useful in mutt -- threaded or
>>> timeline. Which is proved by the fact that I have changed couple of times
>>> in the
a lame history patch for surf 0.2
history.diff
Description: Binary data
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-10-18, 16:56):
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-10-18, 14:31):
> >> I communicate with people all over the world, and ASCII seems to do
> >> the trick. Where's the impetus to change, again?
> >
> > In Hungarian? Other
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 04:56:03PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-10-18, 14:31):
> >> I communicate with people all over the world, and ASCII seems to do
> >> the trick. Where's the impetus to change, again?
> >
>
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-10-18, 14:31):
>> I communicate with people all over the world, and ASCII seems to do
>> the trick. Where's the impetus to change, again?
>
> In Hungarian? Otherwise, stop trolling now, please.
Aww come on I'm jus
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
But, I notice you don't have my nifty hack to make Xorg's compose behavior
the same as Plan 9's, so I still come out ahead. :)
Ah, please tell me what is the hack! I'd love to add it t
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-10-18, 14:31):
> > Heh... Especially related to the topic of the thread. From today on you
> > will only communicate with your Hungarian colleagues using ASCII. Best
> > of luck.
>
> I communicate with people all over the world, and ASCII seems to do
> the trick. Where's
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Yes, let's ditch our national languages, spelling and diacritics, just
> because a minority of users of a niche mailing list bitch about some
> apparently failed UTF-8 implementations.
You don't have to ditch anything. You'll just be less
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2009-10-18, 21:15):
> On 10/18/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> >> ASCII works just fine, thanks.
> >
> > Just fine for the Americans?
>
> fine for anyone who is willing to communicate in english
Yes, let's ditch our national languages, spelling and diacritics, just
because a m
On 10/18/09, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
>> ASCII works just fine, thanks.
>
> Just fine for the Americans?
fine for anyone who is willing to communicate in english
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-10-18, 13:36):
> > In this day and age, anyone using *any* encoding other than UTF-8
> > need to be lockedup and have the key thrown into a black hole,
> > enough harm has been done already by retarded encodings.
>
> ASCII works just fine, thanks.
Just fine for the Ameri
[2009-10-18 18:35] Anselm R Garbe
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq :
> > XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
> > does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
> > XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
> > refuses to parse
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Uriel wrote:
> In this day and age,
> anyone using *any* encoding other than UTF-8 need to be lockedup and
> have the key thrown into a black hole, enough harm has been done
> already by retarded encodings.
ASCII works just fine, thanks. I have yet to see a UTF-
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Ilya Ilembitov wrote:
> if we take spreadsheets as a presentation tool
Why just spreadsheets? Why not /dev/urandom? Or broccoli?
--
# Kurt H Maier
The only reason XHTML did not replace HTML is because IE did not and
does not support it. It is no more geekier than HTML.
But whether XHTML was or will be adopted by the internet is irrelevent
to this discussion as it regards using XHTML for word processing.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Anse
2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq :
> What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML is superior?
Only geeks bother to adopt it. XHTML adoption is around 0.1% of all
web pages, and it is unlikely to take over the world. All browsers and
the web trend travel towards HTML5 for quite some time, there is
What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML is superior?
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq :
>> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
>> does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
>> XHTM
Styles are well defined, and the only web browser I know of that has
ever had problems then is IE. Scripts are not relevent in a word
processing context.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 10/18/09, Tor Aqissiaq wrote:
>> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specific
2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq :
> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
> does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
> XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
> refuses to parse XML. XHTML parsed as HTML + no better than HTM
On 10/18/09, Tor Aqissiaq wrote:
> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
> does not look different in different browsers,
yeah especially the
XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
refuses to parse XML. XHTML parsed as HTML + no better than HTML. I
already use XHTML for sending
2009/10/18 Ilya Ilembitov :
> Yes, you got it totally right. But why do you believe that html would be on
> par with proprietary formats? I mean, is there any possibility that html
> produced by markdown (or similar languages) interpreter won't be displayed
> correctly in most of browsers (inclu
Thanks for the confirmation guess there is something wrong with my system then,
will
have to have a closer look. But nice work anyway (to Fresch or whoever), the
vertical patch makes dmenu
much more useful for certain things.
Cheers
Arian
On Sun 18, 10:30 +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> [200
Uriel dixit (2009-10-18, 17:38):
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 10/18/09, Ilya Ilembitov wrote:
> >> Oh, ok. It's just I've checked
> >> http://lists.suckless.org/dev/0910/index.html
> >> - that's why I was alarmed.
> >>
> >>> Ilya Ilembitov dixit (2009-10-18, 17
Yes, you got it totally right. But why do you believe that html would be on par
with proprietary formats? I mean, is there any possibility that html produced
by markdown (or similar languages) interpreter won't be displayed correctly in
most of browsers (including IE)? I thought it's basic and s
2009/10/18 Илья Илембитов :
> I believe I made some progress with my little research concerning suckless
> word processing.
> Basically, I realised that things get much easier as soon as we realize that
> there is no need for paper-centric formats.
>
> First, there is no standard here, that is co
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:08:22AM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm... Just curious, but what exactly is possible now? I checked the
>> attached file, but the relevant lines seemed to be the same that I had
>> in: http://unix-kb.cat-v.org/GTK_2
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 10/18/09, Ilya Ilembitov wrote:
>> Oh, ok. It's just I've checked http://lists.suckless.org/dev/0910/index.html
>> - that's why I was alarmed.
>>
>>> Ilya Ilembitov dixit (2009-10-18, 17:35):
>>> > Oops, sorry for those weird symbols. I f
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:18 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> wtf is all this spamming about?!
>
> He wants to save his spreadsheets in HTML. I wouldn't bother reading it.
WTF indeed! Is this for real? Its got to be some kind of si
On 10/18/09, Ilya Ilembitov wrote:
> Oh, ok. It's just I've checked http://lists.suckless.org/dev/0910/index.html
> - that's why I was alarmed.
>
>> Ilya Ilembitov dixit (2009-10-18, 17:35):
>> > Oops, sorry for those weird symbols. I forgot to check the language in
>> > which my name will appear
markus schnalke wrote:
[2009-10-15 21:47] sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
Well, I can't tell which view is more useful in mutt -- threaded or
timeline. Which is proved by the fact that I have changed couple of times
in the past the default view from one to another, and switched views at
least once a d
Well, spreadsheets weren't the only point. Besides, if we take spreadsheets as
a presentation tool (and not as an actual calculation solution, in which case
several people should be able to work with the same formulas) - why not? If you
are sending a paper where the text is accompanied by some d
Oh, ok. It's just I've checked http://lists.suckless.org/dev/0910/index.html -
that's why I was alarmed.
> Ilya Ilembitov dixit (2009-10-18, 17:35):
> > Oops, sorry for those weird symbols. I forgot to check the language in
> > which my name will appear on the list.
> UTF-8 is not prohibited on t
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:18 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> wtf is all this spamming about?!
He wants to save his spreadsheets in HTML. I wouldn't bother reading it.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Ilya Ilembitov dixit (2009-10-18, 17:35):
> Oops, sorry for those weird symbols. I forgot to check the language in
> which my name will appear on the list.
UTF-8 is not prohibited on this list. The symbols were perfectly fine,
thank you very much :).
--
[a]
Oops, sorry for those weird symbols. I forgot to check the language in which my
name will appear on the list.
> I believe I made some progress with my little research concerning suckless
> word processing.
> Basically, I realised that things get much easier as soon as we realize that
> there is
Well, as far as I can judge, people use this list not only to discuss the
existing suckless.org projects (such as dwm, wmii, surf, st, etc) but also to
share their ideas about interfaces and productivity that can later be used for
future projects. I've seen people discussing desktop publishing a
wtf is all this spamming about?!
I believe I made some progress with my little research concerning suckless word
processing.
Basically, I realised that things get much easier as soon as we realize that
there is no need for paper-centric formats.
First, there is no standard here, that is correctly supported by all office
suites
[2009-10-17 12:55] Arian Kuschki
>
> is it just me or does dmenu with meillo's vertical patch applied get slower
> and
> slower the more lines you specify with the "-l" option? Anything more than
> about ten lines is unusable on my t42 using Ubuntu Karmic development version.
I don't see any
[2009-10-15 21:47] sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
>
> Well, I can't tell which view is more useful in mutt -- threaded or
> timeline. Which is proved by the fact that I have changed couple of times
> in the past the default view from one to another, and switched views at
> least once a day anyway. Which
41 matches
Mail list logo