Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:26:36PM +0200, Sidney Amani wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the patches, I wonder why does pertag patch is not included in the > mainstream, IMO using dwm without is not handy. > > .. > -- > Sidney Amani > Check the beginning of this month's archive, I started a discussio

Re: [dev] 9base awk bug

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 06:32:02PM +0200, quinq...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi,I tried to build 9base, and I encountered the following > error:In file included from > awk.h:184, > from re.c:34:proto.h:134: error: conflicting types for > 'getline'/usr/include/stdio.h:651: error: previo

Re: [dev] 9base awk bug

P9p now includes awk, one less reason to use 9base. uriel On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:32 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to build 9base, and I encountered the following error: > In file included from awk.h:184, > from re.c:34: > proto.h:134: error: conflicting types for 'getline' > /

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

On 7/20/09, sqweek wrote: >> for example >> (double)atoi("1")/atoi("3") == (double)atoi("1")/atoi("3") >> gives false with gcc on my x86 machine eventhough the two expressions >> are semantically equivalent > > Interesting indeed, I get the same result here. However, if you store > the division r

[dev] dwm with top and bottom bar

Hi list, I would like to share my conf which is optimized for laptops or single screen users. As I like to keep my top bar with the window title and tag descriptions, I couldn't display enough information in the top-right corner. So I just quickly patched dwm to add a empty bottom border and I us

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

Hi, Thanks for the patches, I wonder why does pertag patch is not included in the mainstream, IMO using dwm without is not handy. To fix the warning you are better changing the "lts" variable type: - Layout *lts[LENGTH(tags) + 1]; + const Layout *lts[LENGTH(tags) + 1]; It works fine for me as

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6

2009/7/18 Szabolcs Nagy : > my problem was that it seems that c and ieee754 does not even require > that the arithmetic operations are well defined: same operation on > same numbers with same type does not necessary give the same result > (even on same architecture with same compiler) > > for examp

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

> http://port70.net/~kzed/dwm-5.6/ > batteries not included / ymmv. > worksforme, though > > Best regards, > Mate Works for me too, thank you very much!

[dev] 9base awk bug

9base.awk.20090720.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

On 7/20/09, Donald Allen wrote: > Thanks -- it's in the README, which , of course, I didn't read. Should > be in the man page, though, IMHO. In any case, the suggested code ok, man is updated i think a 5.6.1 will come out soon..

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/7/20 Donald Allen : >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >>> 2009/7/20 Anselm R Garbe : 2009/7/20 Donald Allen : > I installed dwm 5.4.1 from the openbsd package on my Thinkpad X61 > running openbsd 4.

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

Anselm -- By the way, my compliments on your work. I'm of the minimalist persuasion when it comes to almost anything involving computers. I much prefer to start with a small environment and add just what I need and no more. So, of course, I can't stand Windows (for many, many reasons, but its bloa

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

2009/7/20 Donald Allen : > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> 2009/7/20 Anselm R Garbe : >>> 2009/7/20 Donald Allen : I installed dwm 5.4.1 from the openbsd package on my Thinkpad X61 running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than attempts to p

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 7/20/09, Donald Allen wrote: >> running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than >> attempts to pipe the date into stdin not working (I think how to use > this has changed see README in the source (or the man) Thanks -- it'

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > 2009/7/20 Anselm R Garbe : >> 2009/7/20 Donald Allen : >>> I installed dwm 5.4.1 from the openbsd package on my Thinkpad X61 >>> running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than >>> attempts to pipe the date into stdin not work

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

On 7/20/09, Donald Allen wrote: > running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than > attempts to pipe the date into stdin not working (I think how to use this has changed see README in the source (or the man) > type this. Unlike 5.4.1, left-clicking labels has no effect, other > tha

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

2009/7/20 Anselm R Garbe : > 2009/7/20 Donald Allen : >> I installed dwm 5.4.1 from the openbsd package on my Thinkpad X61 >> running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than >> attempts to pipe the date into stdin not working (I think how to use >> the read-from-stdin facility to dis

Re: [dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

2009/7/20 Donald Allen : > I installed dwm 5.4.1 from the openbsd package on my Thinkpad X61 > running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than > attempts to pipe the date into stdin not working (I think how to use > the read-from-stdin facility to display stuff needs to be explained

[dev] dwm-5.6 issues on openbsd 4.5

I installed dwm 5.4.1 from the openbsd package on my Thinkpad X61 running openbsd 4.5 (amd64). Works fine, no issues, other than attempts to pipe the date into stdin not working (I think how to use the read-from-stdin facility to display stuff needs to be explained more fully in the documentation).