On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:22, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
> The design's fundamental assumption is that source files are typically
> smaller than a typical FS block (after compression). Eric and Philip have ran
> tests on SVN and GCC respectively with different results. I do not have
> hard-figures
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:32, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2012 5:59 AM, "Ben Smith-Mannschott"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:22, Ashod Nakashian
>> wrote:
>>...
>
>> > Now, does this justify the cost of a new file-forma
Use text/xml for XML files that you want treated as text, where
setting svn:eol-style makes sense and SVN will attempt to merge
contents. Use application/xml for xml files you want treated as
binary.
// ben
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote:
> SVN properties setting depends
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote:
> SVN properties setting depends on the order.
> (branches/1.7.x, r1330327)
>
> I.e. if I set svn:eol-style before svn:mime-type, everything is ok. Otherwise
> there can be a
> problem. What behaviour is expected: failure in both cases or suc
4 matches
Mail list logo
