Am Tue, 20 May 2025 17:08:21 +0200
schrieb Branko Čibej :
> So, no, we don't currently have a syntax for relative URLs that would do
> what you propose. I don't know offhand what all the ramifications would
> be (other than, well, writing a bushel of tests for that), but if
> someone steps forw
Hi,
So basically the patch becomes this
I can't say I like the actual branch condition, but I'm open to
suggestions :)
Best regards,
Peter
On 2025. 05. 21. 23:47, Peter Balogh wrote:
Hi,
Would my approach (especially the serf change) acceptable, if instead
of 499, I rely on the 401 reason
2 matches
Mail list logo