Re: [DISCUSS] backport.pl or backport.py

Den ons 20 nov. 2024 kl 18:15 skrev Daniel Sahlberg < daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>: > So I'd say we have consensus on moving to the Python implementation - > several +1 and no-one objecting. And since this is far from core code and > it can easily be reverted I don't see a problem at all. > I've

CI jobs for backport.py? (was: [PATCH] Unbreak backport.py unit tests)

Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:43 +00:00: > Any issues with the backport_tests.py aside, one of the unittest tests > fails as well. > > Patch attached. I'd commit it directly, but I'd have to reset my apache.org > password first. In the meantime, Daniel (or anyone else), feel free to

Re: Automated build jobs, GitHub Actions and Buildbot Was: [DISCUSS] backport.pl or backport.py

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 9:17 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den fre 22 nov. 2024 kl 09:39 skrev Daniel Sahlberg > : >> >> Den ons 20 nov. 2024 kl 18:15 skrev Daniel Sahlberg >> : >>> >>> So I'd say we have consensus on moving to the Python implementation - >>> several +1 and no-one objecting. An

Re: svn commit: r1922026 - in /subversion/trunk/.github/workflows: autoconf.yml cmake.yml

On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 12:01 AM Timofei Zhakov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:07 PM wrote: > >> Author: hartmannathan >> Date: Fri Nov 22 15:07:32 2024 >> New Revision: 1922026 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1922026&view=rev >> Log: >> GitHub Actions: Fix a few typos >> >> * wo

Re: svn commit: r1922026 - in /subversion/trunk/.github/workflows: autoconf.yml cmake.yml

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:07 PM wrote: > Author: hartmannathan > Date: Fri Nov 22 15:07:32 2024 > New Revision: 1922026 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1922026&view=rev > Log: > GitHub Actions: Fix a few typos > > * workflows/autoconf.yml > (jobs.build.steps): s/dependecies/dependenci

Automated build jobs, GitHub Actions and Buildbot Was: [DISCUSS] backport.pl or backport.py

Den fre 22 nov. 2024 kl 09:39 skrev Daniel Sahlberg < daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>: > Den ons 20 nov. 2024 kl 18:15 skrev Daniel Sahlberg < > daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>: > >> So I'd say we have consensus on moving to the Python implementation - >> several +1 and no-one objecting. And since this

[PATCH] Unbreak backport.py unit tests

Any issues with the backport_tests.py aside, one of the unittest tests fails as well. Patch attached. I'd commit it directly, but I'd have to reset my apache.org password first. In the meantime, Daniel (or anyone else), feel free to go ahead and commit it if doing so would unblock your workflow.

svntest.verify.compare_dump_files() under Python3

If I force an svnsync test to fail: [[[ Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py === --- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py (revision 1922016) +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py (working copy) @@ -481,7 +