Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format

2022-12-29 Thread Evgeny Kotkov via dev
Karl Fogel writes: > Now, how hard would this be to actually implement? I plan to take a more detailed look at that, but I'm currently on vacation for the New Year holidays. Thanks, Evgeny Kotkov

Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format

2022-12-29 Thread Branko Čibej
On 28.12.2022 13:34, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: Since we need to be backwards compatible with older v1 clients, can this check ever be removed (before Subversion 2)? The case you're citing is specific to the repository, you could easily have a repository format that uses different hashes. The same

Re: Switching from SHA1 to a checksum type without known collisions in 1.15 working copy format

2022-12-29 Thread Karl Fogel
On 29 Dec 2022, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: Karl Fogel writes: Now, how hard would this be to actually implement? I plan to take a more detailed look at that, but I'm currently on vacation for the New Year holidays. That's great to hear, Evgeny. In the meantime, enjoy your vacation! Best re