Re: Issue #525/#4892: on only fetching the pristines we really need

On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 3:32 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:17 PM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > If possible and not overly burdensome, I think it would be a good > > thing to keep the "restore" functionality for the following reasons: > [snip] > > I agree. I know about the

Re: Issue #525/#4892: on only fetching the pristines we really need

"Restore" isn't involved in our use cases. The only reason I mentioned the "restore" functionality in the first place is because my proof-of-concept patch deliberately leaves that broken because it's non-core functionality, that also will need modifying to make it work in the new way if we proce